§ 14a UWG – Right to Information

The right to information under § 14a UWG enables certain institutions to uncover the identity of individuals or companies who may be violating competition law. The background is that unfair commercial practices often occur via telephone numbers or post office boxes, without the responsible person being immediately identifiable. To ensure that legal violations can still be pursued, the law obliges certain postal and telecommunications companies to disclose existing customer data. The claim thus serves to clarify competition violations and facilitates the enforcement of fair competition law.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Entitled Bodies under § 14a UWG

The right to information under § 14a UWG is not available to every person who suspects a competition violation. The legislator has deliberately restricted the circle of authorized parties. This is to prevent personal data from being disclosed without sufficient control.

The regulation aims to effectively clarify unfair commercial practices, while simultaneously protecting the interests of the affected users. Therefore, only certain legally designated institutions may request information.

Anyone who does not belong to this group of people cannot invoke § 14a UWG and must examine whether other legal options exist.

Institutions Entitled to Bring Legal Action

The entitled bodies include several organizations to which the law assigns a special role in enforcing competition law. They can act if they have a well-founded suspicion of an unfair commercial practice and require the identity of the responsible party for legal action.

These include:

• Austrian Federal Economic Chamber
• Federal Chamber of Labour and Employees
• Austrian Trade Union Federation
• Federal Competition Authority
• Association for Consumer Information

These institutions represent public or collective interests and are intended to be able to effectively combat competition violations. The right to information provides them with the opportunity to identify those responsible who operate behind a telephone number or a post office box.

Association for the Protection against Unfair Competition

In addition to the legally named institutions, the Association for the Protection against Unfair Competition is also authorized to request information.

The Association for the Protection against Unfair Competition has been involved in prosecuting competition violations for many years and supports fair competition. In practice, it acts when companies are disadvantaged by misleading advertising, aggressive sales practices, or other unfair measures.

For the association to effectively pursue such violations, it may demand the disclosure of user data under the conditions of § 14a UWG. The information serves exclusively to identify the potential infringer and to prepare further legal steps.

No Entitlement for Competitors

For many entrepreneurs, the fact that competitors themselves do not have a right to information under § 14a UWG is surprising.

Anyone directly affected by a competition violation cannot therefore base the disclosure of data solely on this provision. The legislator wanted to prevent companies from using the regulation as a general investigative tool against competitors.

However, this does not mean that competitors are unprotected. Depending on the facts, other legal claims for information or judicial possibilities for identifying the responsible party may be considered.

Companies Obligated to Provide Information

Not every company must provide information under § 14a UWG. The provision applies exclusively to service providers who, due to their activities, have access to certain user data.

The legislator selected these companies because they are often the only entities that can establish a connection between a telephone number, a post office box, and the person behind it.

Postal Service Providers

Companies that offer postal services and process the names and addresses of their users are obliged to provide information.

The regulation is intended to prevent individuals or companies from hiding behind a post office box and thereby concealing their identity. Anyone who conducts business correspondence exclusively via a post office box should not be able to evade legal prosecution solely by doing so.

If a permissible request for information is made, the postal service provider must disclose the available data, provided that it is available without additional investigations.

Telecommunications Providers

Telecommunications providers also fall under § 14a UWG.

This includes companies that provide telephone connections or comparable communication services. Especially in the case of advertising calls or other actions relevant under competition law, often only a telephone number is known.

In such cases, the right to information makes it possible to identify the person or company behind a telephone number. This allows competition violations to be pursued more effectively.

Limits of the Obligation to Provide Information

The obligation to provide information is not unlimited. Service providers do not have to conduct extensive investigations or procure new information.

Only data that is disclosed:

• already exists,
• is available without further investigation,
• concerns a domestic post office box or a domestic telephone number.

Therefore, information that the provider would have to laboriously research is not covered. The legislator wanted to limit the right to information to those data that are already stored in the normal course of business.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Prerequisites for a Right to Information

The right to information under § 14a UWG requires several legal prerequisites. The legislator has deliberately made these requirements strict because the disclosure of user data constitutes an interference with the privacy of the person concerned. Information can therefore only be considered if there is a comprehensible interest in legal action and the legal prerequisites are fully met.

Anyone requesting information must present the individual prerequisites already in the request for information. If necessary details are missing, the claim fails.

Well-founded Suspicion of an Unfair Commercial Practice

At the heart of the right to information is a well-founded suspicion of an unfair commercial practice.

It is not enough merely to suspect a competition violation. Rather, concrete facts must exist that make the suspicion appear comprehensible. The applicant for information must therefore explain what conduct is being complained about and why this conduct may violate competition law.

A well-founded suspicion may exist, for example, in cases of:

• misleading advertising
• aggressive sales methods
• concealed company identity
• other unfair commercial practices towards consumers

The more precisely the actual circumstances are described, the easier it is to understand the justification of the request for information. A mere assertion without concrete indications is not sufficient.

Written Request for Information

The law explicitly requires a written request for information.

The applicant for information must clearly present all prerequisites therein. This includes, in particular, the grounds for suspicion and the justification as to why the requested data is needed.

The written form creates clarity for all parties involved. It documents the content of the request and allows for a later review of the legal prerequisites.

A request for information must contain the following:

• the explanation of the necessity for legal action
• the description of the suspected competition violation,
• the reasons for the suspicion,
• the specific data required,

Necessity of Data for Legal Action

The requested data must be necessary for pursuing the suspected competition violation. The right to information is not intended to obtain general information about a person or a company. Its purpose is rather to determine the identity of a possible infringer and thereby enable the enforcement of competition law claims.

The applicant for information must therefore comprehensibly explain why they need the information. It is not sufficient merely to refer to a general interest in the user’s identity. Rather, there must be a concrete connection between the requested data and the planned legal action.

No Other Means of Obtaining Information

Another prerequisite is that the required information cannot be obtained through generally accessible sources. The legislator understands the right to information as an aid for special situations in which the identity of the responsible party remains hidden despite reasonable inquiries.

Therefore, the applicant for information must explain why other sources of information are not sufficient. If the necessary data can already be obtained from publicly accessible registers, imprint information, or comparable sources, there is no claim under § 14a UWG. Only when such possibilities are exhausted does the legal obligation to provide information come into consideration.

This restriction is intended to prevent the right to information from being used for the simple procurement of data, even though the information would already be available by other means. This limits the disclosure of personal data to those cases in which it is actually necessary.

Scope of Data to be Disclosed

The right to information under § 14a UWG does not entitle access to all data of a user. The law deliberately limits the scope of information to those details that are necessary for identifying the responsible party. This is intended to strike an appropriate balance between effective legal action and the protection of personal data.

The name or company name of the user and their address must be disclosed, provided that this data is available to the service provider. The provider only has to disclose information that they have already processed and stored for the provision of their services. There is no obligation to procure additional information.

Furthermore, the regulation only covers data relating to a domestic post office box or a non-publicly registered domestic telephone number. This covers cases where the identity of the responsible party remains hidden precisely through the use of a post office box or a telephone number. The information therefore serves exclusively to determine the person or company behind these means of communication.

However, the service provider does not have to conduct its own investigations. If certain information is not available or can only be determined through additional investigations, there is no obligation to provide information in this regard.

Information Disclosure Procedure

The information disclosure procedure begins with a written request for information from the entitled body. This letter must outline the legal prerequisites and explain the reasons for the suspicion of an unfair commercial practice.

Upon receipt of the request, the service provider checks whether the formal requirements are met. Unlike a court, it does not have to assess whether a competition violation actually exists. Rather, the decisive factor is whether the request for information contains the necessary details and comprehensibly presents the legal prerequisites.

If the request meets the requirements of the law, the provider must disclose the available data in writing. The procedure is intended to enable rapid identification of the potential infringer and thereby facilitate the subsequent enforcement of competition law claims.

In practice, the request for information is of particular importance. The clearer and more comprehensible the prerequisites are presented, the lower the risk of delays or rejection of the request.

Deadline for Providing Information

The law does not specify a concrete number of days within which the information must be provided. Instead, § 14a UWG requires a reasonable period.

What is considered reasonable depends on the circumstances of the individual case. However, according to the prevailing opinion in legal literature, the information should be provided within a manageable period. A period of approximately two weeks is often used as a guideline.

This regulation is intended to ensure that the identity of the responsible party can be determined as quickly as possible.

Form of Information

The information itself must be provided in writing. This ensures traceability of what information was disclosed and on what basis the data transfer took place.

The written form serves both the protection of the applicant for information and the protection of the service provider. It creates clear documentation of the process and facilitates a later review should a dispute arise over the legality of the information disclosure.

Costs and Liability in Connection with the Right to Information

Providing information under § 14a UWG can involve organizational and economic effort for the affected service provider. Therefore, the law stipulates that the applicant for information must reimburse the provider for the reasonable costs of providing the information. This is to prevent companies from having to bear the expenses associated with processing a request for information themselves.

An exception applies to the Federal Competition Authority, which, according to the law, does not have to pay cost compensation.

Furthermore, the law protects the service provider from potential financial consequences of data disclosure. The applicant for information must indemnify the provider against claims that users might assert due to the information disclosure. The service provider should not be left with costs or damages because of the disclosure of data. These risks are generally borne by the party requesting the information.

This ensures that the service provider does not suffer any financial disadvantages due to the legally prescribed disclosure of data and can process legitimate requests for information without undue risk.

Enforcement of the Right to Information

The right to information under § 14a UWG is intended to ensure that legitimate requests for information do not remain ineffective. If a service provider refuses to disclose the required data or does not respond within a reasonable time, legal options exist to enforce the claim.

Judicial enforcement not only serves to protect the entitled institutions. It also ensures that it is independently reviewed whether the legal prerequisites are actually met. This creates a balance between the interest in effective legal action and the protection of the affected users.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Refusal to Provide Information

Not every request for information leads to the disclosure of the desired information. A service provider can refuse to provide information if the legal prerequisites are not met or essential details are missing.

A refusal may be considered if no sufficient suspicion of an unfair commercial practice is presented, or if the requested data is not covered by the scope of § 14a UWG. Likewise, there is no obligation to disclose information that the provider does not possess or that would only have to be obtained through additional investigations.

However, the rejection of a request for information does not automatically mean that no claim exists. Whether the refusal was lawful can be judicially reviewed.

Judicial Enforcement

If the service provider fails to comply with its obligation to provide information, the claim can be asserted in court. The court then examines whether the legal prerequisites of § 14a UWG are met and whether there is a right to disclosure of the data.

The focus is not on whether the alleged competition violation actually exists. Rather, the decisive factor is whether there is a well-founded suspicion and whether the further prerequisites for the information have been met. If the court reaches this conclusion, it can oblige the service provider to provide the information.

Your Benefits with Legal Assistance

The right to information under § 14a UWG can be an important basis for determining the identity of individuals or companies behind unfair commercial practices. In practice, however, it often depends on the correct legal basis, a careful justification of the suspicion, and compliance with the legal prerequisites. Even small errors can lead to a request for information being unsuccessful.

Legal counsel helps to correctly classify the facts legally and to initiate the necessary steps in a targeted manner. This reduces time loss and avoidable risks.

Your benefits at a glance:

• Thorough legal review of whether the prerequisites of § 14a UWG or other claims for information are met.
• Legally sound preparation and enforcement of the request for information against the responsible service provider.
• Strategic support in pursuing competition violations and enforcing further claims.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQ

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation