Sentence Enhancement for Recidivism

Section 39 of the Criminal Code regulates sentence enhancement for qualified recidivism. The law requires that the offender has already incurred two previous convictions for offenses based on the same harmful propensity, and that these sentences have been at least partially served (including through the crediting of pre-trial detention). If the convicted offender commits such an offense again after reaching the age of 19, the statutory maximum of the custodial or monetary sentence is generally increased by half, but to a maximum of twenty years imprisonment. Section 39, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code establishes deadlines, after the expiry of which previous sentences are disregarded.

Principle

Section 39 of the Criminal Code serves to more severely sanction persistent delinquent behavior based on a specific harmful propensity. The provision tightens the penalty framework where the risk of recurrence and the persistence of criminal propensity are particularly evident.

Conditions for Application

1. The offender has been convicted twice already for offenses that are based on the same harmful propensity.
2. These previous sentences must have been at least partially served. This also includes periods considered served through the crediting of pre-trial detention.
3. The new offense is committed by the offender after reaching the age of 19.
4. The time limits under Paragraph 2 must not apply: a previous sentence is disregarded if more than five years have passed since its serving (ten years for particularly serious offenses punishable by at least ten years). For conditionally suspended sentences, the period only begins with their legal finality.

The court ascertains the facts that prove these conditions and makes the decision on applicability within the scope of its sentencing.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Legal Consequence

If the court determines that the conditions are met, it increases the maximum threatened penalty by half; however, the maximum term of imprisonment remains limited to 20 years. Section 39 alters the sentencing framework: The specific sentence remains at the court’s discretion within the newly established upper limit.

Examples of “Same Harmful Propensity” (Illustration)

• Repeated property offenses (e.g., multiple thefts of the same pattern),
• repeated violent offenses directed against persons with similar modi operandi,
• repeatedly committed sexual offenses of a similar nature.

Whether a propensity is similar is decided by the court based on motives, modus operandi, and the overall picture.

Relationship to other Provisions

Section 39 of the Criminal Code operates alongside the general rules of sentencing and the specific aggravating and mitigating circumstances. The facts that constitute recidivism can simultaneously be considered aggravating circumstances; however, the court must avoid impermissible double counting and provide comprehensible reasons for its assessment.

Practice and Judicial Review

The court conducts the necessary factual findings to fulfill the conditions and documents them in the judgment. The application of Section 39 remains a discretionary decision within the scope of sentencing; erroneous factual findings or legal errors in assessing deadlines provide grounds for appeal and revision.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Legal Remedy against Application

Anyone who considers the application of Section 39 unlawful must challenge the formal or substantive errors in the appeal or revision proceedings. Judicial review specifically examines whether the previous convictions meet the legally required characteristics and whether the time limits were correctly applied.

Your Benefits with Legal Assistance

A criminal proceeding is a significant burden for those affected. Serious consequences threaten right from the start – from coercive measures such as house searches or arrests, to entries in the criminal register, to custodial or monetary penalties. Errors in the initial phase, such as thoughtless statements or insufficient preservation of evidence, often cannot be corrected later. Economic risks such as claims for damages or procedural costs can also be substantial.

Specialized criminal defense ensures that your rights are protected from the outset. It provides security in dealing with the police and public prosecutor’s office, protects against self-incrimination, and creates the basis for a clear defense strategy.

Our law firm:

• examines whether and to what extent the accusation is legally sustainable,
• accompanies you through investigation proceedings and main hearing,
• ensures legally sound applications, statements, and procedural steps,
• assists in defending against or settling civil law claims,
• protects your rights and interests vis-à-vis the court, public prosecutor’s office, and victims.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQ