Civil claims in criminal proceedings are those civil law claims that a victim may assert directly in criminal proceedings against the accused pursuant to § 69 StPO. This includes claims for performance, declaratory relief, or legal modification, provided they are derived directly from the criminal offense. The criminal proceedings remain limited to their criminal law function, but take into account the civil law consequences of the offense in order to enable efficient enforcement of the victim’s claims. Questions of personal status are not decided independently, but are assessed only as preliminary issues. The purpose of the provision is to integrate civil law issues substantively without requiring separate civil proceedings.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Concept and Function of Civil Claims

Civil claims in criminal proceedings enable victims to assert civil law claims directly in ongoing criminal proceedings. These are claims that arise directly from the criminal offense and are directed against the accused. The criminal proceedings remain focused on determining criminal responsibility, while also taking into account the civil law consequences of the offense.

The private party may assert claims for performance, declaratory relief, or legal modification, provided they are derived from the offense. The court does not treat these claims in isolation, but rather in connection with the findings of the criminal proceedings. This avoids duplicate evidence-taking and facilitates the enforcement of compensation claims in a procedurally efficient manner.

The function of the provision is not to transform criminal proceedings into civil proceedings, but rather to provide victims with effective access to their claims without necessarily referring them to separate civil litigation.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Status of the Victim as a Private Party

A person who asserts civil claims in criminal proceedings acquires the status of a private party. This status arises through an express declaration to the criminal police, the public prosecutor’s office, or the court. With this status, the victim is formally integrated into the proceedings, albeit exclusively for the purpose of enforcing their civil law interests.

The private party does not assume any functions of criminal prosecution. They do not influence the conviction or the sentence. Their participation is limited to those aspects of the proceedings that are necessary for clarifying and enforcing the asserted claim. This clear separation protects the structure of the criminal proceedings while safeguarding the victim’s rights.

The status of a private party entails the following possibilities in particular:

• Assertion and specification of one’s own claims
• Participation in procedural acts insofar as they concern the claim
• Use of the evidence obtained in the criminal proceedings

Private party status thus creates a legally secured role without relegating the victim to a mere observer position.

Types of Assertable Claims

Only those civil claims that result directly from the criminal offense may be pursued in criminal proceedings. The law permits different types of claims, provided there is a clear connection between the offense and the claim.

The following claims typically come into consideration:

• Pecuniary claims, such as compensation for repair costs or loss of earnings
• Claims for physical or health impairments, including pain and suffering
• Declaratory claims, when the exact amount of damage cannot yet be finally quantified

Claims that are only indirectly connected to the offense or require comprehensive civil law clarification that would exceed the scope of the criminal proceedings are not admissible. In such cases, the court refers the matter to civil proceedings.

The decisive factor is always that the claim is presented in a concrete, comprehensible, and legally derivable manner. General demands or mere assumptions are insufficient and jeopardize the status as a private party.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Timing and Form of the Declaration of Joinder

Civil claims are not automatically considered in criminal proceedings. The victim must actively declare that they wish to assert their claims in the proceedings. This declaration of joinder may be made informally and either in writing or orally for the record. Depending on the stage of the proceedings, the declaration is received by the criminal police, the public prosecutor’s office, or the court.

In terms of timing, joinder remains possible until the close of the evidentiary proceedings. However, within this period, it is not sufficient to merely announce the claim in general terms. The victim must clearly indicate which damage arises from which offense. The more specific the information, the more likely the court will be able to address the claim in the criminal proceedings.

An effective declaration of joinder therefore requires:

• a clear connection between the criminal offense and the asserted claim,
• a comprehensible presentation of the damage incurred,
• a quantification of the claim as soon as this is factually possible.

If the declaration remains vague or is made too late, the court can no longer consider the asserted claims in the criminal proceedings. The correct timing and a minimum level of substantive clarity therefore determine whether the criminal proceedings can be used to enforce the claim.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Relationship Between Criminal Proceedings and Civil Proceedings

Criminal proceedings primarily serve to clarify the offense and the question of guilt. They do not replace civil proceedings, but can usefully supplement them. The criminal court addresses civil claims only insofar as they can be assessed on the basis of the criminal law findings.

The court relies on the evidence already obtained and avoids new points of dispute. As soon as the examination of claims would require additional effort beyond the criminal proceedings, the decision is transferred to civil proceedings. The criminal proceedings thus remain limited to their core function.

The interaction between the two proceedings follows clear guidelines:

• the criminal proceedings clarify the offense and immediate consequences of damage,
• the civil proceedings enable complete civil law enforcement,
• a decision in criminal proceedings does not necessarily preclude further steps.

This gradation does not result in the victim losing any rights. Rather, it creates flexible claim enforcement that is oriented toward the probative value of the criminal court’s findings.

Decision on Claims in the Judgment

In the event of a conviction, the court also decides in the same judgment on the asserted civil claims, insofar as this is possible. The basis for this is the evidentiary proceedings and the information provided by the private party. The court examines whether the damage and claim can be established with sufficient clarity.

Depending on the outcome, the court awards the claim in full, recognizes it only in part, or refers the victim to civil proceedings. In the case of monetary claims, the court specifically determines the awarded amount and makes it enforceable.

In the judgment, the court may in particular:

• award a specific monetary amount,
• establish a claim in principle,
• issue a referral to civil proceedings.

If the court acquits the accused, it does not make a substantive decision on the claim and refers the victim to enforcement outside the criminal proceedings. In this case, the victim’s only recourse is to the civil court. Even in the case of a partial referral, the victim may continue to pursue their claims outside the criminal proceedings.

If objects or assets belonging to the victim have been seized during the proceedings, they may be returned as part of the criminal proceedings. The prerequisite is that the objects are no longer needed for the proceedings and no third-party rights stand in the way. This enables the victim to recover their property without having to conduct separate proceedings.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Referral to Civil Proceedings

The criminal court decides on civil claims insofar as the damage can be clarified on the basis of the existing procedural findings without significantly delaying the course of the criminal proceedings. If there is insufficient basis for this, the court refers the victim to civil proceedings. This referral does not constitute a rejection, but rather a postponement of claim enforcement.

Common reasons lie in the complexity of the damage or the scope of the necessary evidence. An acquittal also regularly results in the criminal court not deciding on civil claims.

The court refers in particular when:

• the amount of damage cannot be reliably determined,
• multiple legal bases would have to be examined separately,
• additional expert opinions would be required.

The referral does not result in the victim losing any claims. Rather, it provides the opportunity to assert them fully and independently before the civil court. A criminal conviction can form an important starting point there.

Cost Risks and Cost Reimbursement

The enforcement of civil claims in criminal proceedings does not incur separate court fees. The victim uses proceedings that are already underway, which keeps the financial burden within limits. Costs arise primarily when additional legal steps become necessary or civil proceedings follow.

If the court awards a claim to the victim, it may also impose cost reimbursement obligations on the accused. These relate to expenses directly connected with the enforcement of the claim. However, complete cost coverage does not automatically result from this.

The following are particularly cost-relevant:

• a partial or complete referral to civil proceedings,
• subsequent civil proceedings,
• legal representation without granted legal aid.

The actual cost risk therefore depends heavily on the course of the proceedings. A realistic assessment in advance helps avoid financial misjudgments and choose the most sensible path for claim enforcement.

Your Benefits with Legal Assistance

The enforcement of civil claims in criminal proceedings requires precise coordination between the presentation of facts, the stage of proceedings, and legal assessment. Even minor ambiguities in the substantiation of the claim or the temporal classification can result in the court not deciding or referring the matter to civil proceedings.

Legal representation ensures that civil claims are integrated into the criminal proceedings in a manner that is substantively clear, procedurally correct, and realistically enforceable. The focus is not on expanding the proceedings, but on making appropriate use of the investigative and evidentiary findings already available.

In practice, this is particularly reflected in the fact that

• the claim is legally derived from the criminal offense in a comprehensible manner,
• the scope and limits of the criminal court’s decision-making authority are correctly assessed,
• unnecessary referrals to civil proceedings are avoided or specifically prepared.

This structured approach creates clarity regarding the actual possibilities of claim enforcement and enables the victim to make informed decisions about further action.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation