Ski Course

The liability of ski schools in Austria encompasses all legal responsibilities that ski schools and their instructors have towards course participants and third parties. It is based on general civil law provisions according to § 1295 ABGB, specific norms such as the provincial ski school laws, and relevant criminal law provisions. At its core, it means that ski schools must ensure the safety of their students, whether through proper organization, qualified personnel, or adherence to duties of care. In the event of accidents, contractual liability, tortious liability, insurance-related aspects, and potentially criminal responsibilities play a role.

Legal Framework of Ski School Liability

The liability of a ski school arises from several laws and regulations. Crucially: ski schools bear responsibility for the safety of their students and must organize themselves accordingly.

Key Principles

• Austrian General Civil Code (ABGB): establishes the general duty to pay damages. Errors by ski instructors are attributed to the ski school. Supervisory duties also arise from it.
• Provincial Ski School Laws: regulate who may operate a ski school, what qualifications instructors must have, and what group sizes are permitted.
• Consumer Protection Act (KSchG): prevents ski schools from evading responsibility for personal injury through their General Terms and Conditions.
• FIS Rules: these international rules of conduct serve as a benchmark for what constitutes careful behavior on the slopes.
• Criminal Law: in cases of particularly serious breaches of duty, criminal liability may also arise (e.g., negligent bodily harm or failure to render assistance).

Practical Significance

In practice, this means: The ski school must organize its lessons safely and employ suitable instructors. If a ski instructor makes a mistake, the ski school itself is generally liable for it. However, towards external third parties, it is only held responsible if its own organizational shortcomings are demonstrable. Even if a student behaves grossly improperly, this can reduce the claim. It is also clear that General Terms and Conditions cannot exclude liability for personal injury.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Contractual Liability

Booking a ski course establishes a training contract. This entails protective and due diligence obligations for the ski school: safe lesson design, appropriate grouping by skill level, suitable route selection, clear warnings about risks, and inspection for obvious equipment defects. Violations of these obligations give rise to compensation claims by the ski student.

Duties of the Ski School

• Safe organization of lessons and groups
• Grouping by age, maturity, and skiing ability
• Appropriate selection of slopes and terrain, considering weather and conditions
• Information on typical dangers and rules of conduct
• Inspection for obvious equipment defects

If the ski school breaches these duties and damage results, there is a contractual claim for compensation.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Contributory Negligence of Participants

A student’s own misconduct can reduce the claim (e.g., gross rule violations or ignoring clear instructions). Nevertheless, the ski school’s duties remain in effect.

Role of Ski Instructors as Vicarious Agents

Ski instructors act as vicarious agents of the ski school. Their errors are attributed to the ski school. In practice, claims are regularly directed against the ski school.

Tortious Liability

Tortious liability concerns damages outside of a contract and requires personal fault. Ski instructors are generally personally liable; in practice, the Employee Liability Act protects them in cases of slight negligence.

Liability of the Ski School (Tortious)

The ski school is only liable for its own misconduct, particularly in cases of

• insufficient selection or training of instructors (negligent selection),
• deficient organization (e.g., excessively large groups, lack of safety instructions),
• lack of control or supervision.

Burden of Proof

Injured parties must prove an organizational or supervisory error by the ski school and its causal link.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Typical Liability Situations in Ski Schools

Beginner Lessons

Beginners, in particular, are especially vulnerable. If they are overchallenged, for instance, by a ski instructor immediately leading them onto steep or icy slopes, this can constitute a clear breach of duty. If the student falls and is injured, the ski school is liable for this error.

Group Courses and Supervisory Duties

In groups, the instructor must always maintain an overview. If they lose sight of students or exceed the group size, the risk of accidents increases significantly. Should collisions or falls then occur, the ski school may be liable for injuries.

Organizational Deficiencies

Not only individual instructors but also the ski school as a whole can make mistakes. Typical examples include: excessively large groups, missing safety instructions, insufficiently qualified instructors, or ignoring weather and avalanche warnings. In such cases, this is referred to as organizational fault.

Negligent Selection

The ski school is also liable if it employs unsuitable or unqualified instructors. If an inexperienced instructor is assigned to a difficult group and an accident occurs, the ski school can additionally be held responsible for negligent personnel selection.

Insurance Law Aspects

Ski School Liability Insurance

Every ski school must have adequate liability insurance. This covers damages for which the ski school or its instructors are legally liable. However, the insurance only pays out if actual fault exists. It does not replace general accident insurance.

Accident Insurance for Participants

Ski students are not automatically covered by accident insurance. If a fall occurs without fault, the ski school provides no compensation. In such cases, either private accident insurance or, for school events, the statutory student accident insurance via AUVA applies. Parents should therefore definitely ensure private coverage.

Liability Insurance for Participants

Course participants themselves can also cause damage, for example, if a student collides with a third party. In such cases, private liability insurance, which is usually included in household insurance policies, helps.

Social Insurance for Ski Instructors

Instructors are generally insured with AUVA. If an instructor is injured during their work, they are covered by statutory accident insurance. The student is not liable to them.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Contractual Agreements and General Terms and Conditions

Terms and Conditions Clauses in Ski Schools

Many ski schools use General Terms and Conditions in which they seek to limit liability. A typical clause states that accident and liability insurance are the participant’s responsibility and that the ski school assumes no responsibility.

Legal Limits

For personal injury: A disclaimer of liability is legally impermissible. Neither in General Terms and Conditions nor in forms can the ski school exclude its responsibility for injuries, regardless of whether it involves slight or gross negligence. For property damage, a limited exclusion is possible, provided there is no gross negligence.

Implications for Participants

Even if General Terms and Conditions appear far-reaching at first glance, statutory protective mechanisms remain in place. Injured parties cannot be deprived of their claims by fine print. Conversely: The ski school is indeed not liable for damages without fault.

Key Takeaway

GTC clauses do not change the core principle: A ski school must always be held responsible for personal injuries if it or its instructors have acted culpably.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Relevant Case Law

In recent years, the courts have clarified the liability of ski schools and ski instructors. The Supreme Court (OGH) in particular has developed central guidelines:

Emergency Fall Case

A ski instructor intentionally caused a student to fall to prevent an impending collision with another skier. The student was seriously injured. The OGH ruled: The ski instructor and the ski school are liable. Without clearly demonstrable immediate danger, the instructor may not intervene so drastically. The interference with physical integrity was unlawful.

Terrain Selection and Avalanche Risk

For off-piste skiing, a ski instructor must exercise particular caution. Avalanche reports, weather, and snow conditions must be considered. The OGH clarified: Fault only exists if an avalanche danger was recognizable and disregarded. Unforeseeable natural events, however, do not automatically lead to liability.

Supervisory Duty for Children

Strict standards apply to children’s courses. A ski instructor must consider the age, maturity, and ability of the children. Courts carefully examine whether the duty of supervision was observed. Exoneration due to alleged contributory negligence of the child is hardly possible, as children under 14 years of age have limited tortious capacity.

Principle of Proportionality

Not every misjudgment establishes liability. Only when there is a stark disproportion between the students’ ability and the difficulty of the chosen slope is it considered negligence. Courts aim to prevent ski instructors from acting excessively cautiously out of fear of liability.

Special Considerations for Liability towards Minors

When Children are Harmed

Children enjoy special protection under Austrian law. Below 14 years of age, tortious capacity is limited or non-existent. This means: A child’s own contributory negligence is only considered very cautiously. This increases the risk for the ski school, as it can hardly invoke the child’s errors. The standard for supervision and care is set significantly higher.

When Children Cause Damage

If a child from the ski course causes an accident, the court primarily examines the supervisory duty of the ski school and the ski instructor. The standard is what a reasonable supervisor would have done in the specific situation. The younger the child, the stricter the duty of direct supervision. A 5-year-old may not ski alone, while a 12-year-old can be expected to have more independence.

Practical Consequences for Ski Schools

• Children’s courses must be organized to be particularly small and manageable.
• There is an increased duty to minimize risk (e.g., simple slope selection, helmet and safety equipment, additional supervisors for young children).
• Documented safety measures are crucial to be able to exonerate oneself in an emergency.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Criminal Liability for Gross Negligence or Bodily Harm

General Framework

In addition to civil liability, misconduct by ski instructors or ski schools can also have criminal consequences. The decisive factor is whether the physical safety of others was endangered or violated due to breaches of duty of care.

Overview of Typical Offenses

• Negligent Bodily Harm: When a ski instructor injures students or third parties through careless actions.
• Negligent Homicide: If fatal accidents occur due to gross misjudgments, criminal consequences, including prison sentences, are possible.
• Endangerment of Physical Safety: Even creating a significant danger, for example, through risky terrain selection, can be punishable, even without a specific injury.
• Failure to Render Assistance: Anyone who fails to help an injured person or abandons them is liable to prosecution.

Implications for Ski Schools

• Primarily, the acting person (e.g., the ski instructor) is criminally responsible.
• Ski school managers can also be prosecuted if they deliberately create risks or violate supervisory duties.
• Legal entities (e.g., a ski school GmbH) can also be held accountable under the Corporate Criminal Liability Act if breaches of duty are systematically committed.

Practical Consequence

Even careless decisions, such as disregarding avalanche warnings or overchallenging beginners, can become criminally relevant. Prevention, clear organization, and adherence to all safety standards are therefore essential.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Your Benefits with Legal Assistance

The liability of ski schools often raises complex questions: What duties exist during lessons, when does insurance apply, and in which cases are civil or even criminal consequences threatened? For injured parties, it is about securing claims for compensation, medical costs, or pain and suffering. For ski schools and ski instructors, on the other hand, the focus is on defending against unjustified claims and protection from significant economic consequences.

A specialized law firm ensures that you gain clarity about your legal situation and are professionally represented at every stage. You benefit from experience, negotiation skills, and consistent enforcement of your interests.

Our law firm

• examines which legal bases are relevant in your case,
• accompanies you through the entire process until the final resolution,
• ensures that all steps are implemented in a legally sound manner,
• supports you in calculating, enforcing, or defending claims,
• consistently protects your rights and interests against ski schools, insurance companies, and authorities.

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQ

Select Your Preferred Appointment Now:Free initial consultation