{"id":126241,"date":"2026-03-10T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-10T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/drept-penal\/redeschiderea-procedurii-administrative\/"},"modified":"2026-03-10T12:53:01","modified_gmt":"2026-03-10T11:53:01","slug":"redeschiderea-procedurii-administrative","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/drept-penal\/redeschiderea-procedurii-administrative\/","title":{"rendered":"Redeschiderea procedurii administrative"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-table-of-contents yoast-table-of-contents\"><h2>Redeschiderea procedurii administrative<\/h2><ul><li><a href=\"#h-bedeutung-und-zweck-der-wiederaufnahme\" data-level=\"3\">Semnifica\u021bia \u0219i scopul redeschiderii<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-rechtsgrundlagen-nach-avg-und-abgrenzung-zu-anderen-rechtsbehelfen\" data-level=\"3\">Baze legale conform AVG \u0219i delimitare fa\u021b\u0103 de alte c\u0103i de atac<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-voraussetzungen-der-wiederaufnahme\" data-level=\"2\">Condi\u021biile redeschiderii<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-formelle-rechtskraft-und-abgeschlossener-bescheid\" data-level=\"3\">Puterea de lucru judecat formal\u0103 \u0219i decizie finalizat\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-wiederaufnahmegrunde-nach-69-avg\" data-level=\"3\">Motive de redeschidere conform \u00a7 69 AVG<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-wiederaufnahmegrunde-im-uberblick\" data-level=\"2\">Motive de redeschidere \u2013 prezentare general\u0103<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-erschleichung-und-gerichtlich-strafbare-handlungen\" data-level=\"3\">Ob\u021binere frauduloas\u0103 \u0219i ac\u021biuni penale<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-neu-hervorgekommene-tatsachen-und-beweismittel\" data-level=\"3\">Fapte \u0219i mijloace de prob\u0103 nou ap\u0103rute<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-nachtraglich-anders-entschiedene-vorfrage\" data-level=\"3\">Chestiune preliminar\u0103 solu\u021bionat\u0103 ulterior \u00een mod diferit<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-nachtraglich-bekannt-gewordene-entscheidung-und-entschiedene-sache\" data-level=\"3\">Decizie cunoscut\u0103 ulterior \u0219i lucru judecat<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-fristen-und-antragstellung\" data-level=\"2\">Termene \u0219i depunerea cererii<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-zweiwochige-frist-ab-kenntnis-des-wiederaufnahmegrundes\" data-level=\"3\">Termen de dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni de la cunoa\u0219terea motivului de redeschidere<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-absolute-dreijahresfrist-und-ausnahmen\" data-level=\"3\">Termen absolut de trei ani \u0219i excep\u021bii<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-zustandige-behorde-und-richtige-einbringungsstelle\" data-level=\"3\">Autoritatea competent\u0103 \u0219i locul corect de depunere<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-ablauf-und-entscheidung-im-wiederaufnahmeverfahren\" data-level=\"2\">Desf\u0103\u0219urarea \u0219i decizia \u00een procedura de redeschidere<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-prufung-und-entscheidungsarten-der-behorde\" data-level=\"3\">Verificarea \u0219i tipurile de decizii ale autorit\u0103\u021bii<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-inhalt-des-wiederaufnahmebescheids-nach-70-avg\" data-level=\"3\">Con\u021binutul deciziei de redeschidere conform \u00a7 70 AVG<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-wirkung-auf-den-bisherigen-bescheid-und-fortsetzung-des-verfahrens\" data-level=\"3\">Efectul asupra deciziei anterioare \u0219i continuarea procedurii<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-rechtsschutz-nach-der-entscheidung\" data-level=\"2\">Protec\u021bie juridic\u0103 dup\u0103 decizie<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-rechtsmittel-gegen-die-ablehnung\" data-level=\"3\">C\u0103i de atac \u00eempotriva respingerii<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-rechtsschutz-nach-bewilligung-und-neuer-sachentscheidung\" data-level=\"3\">Protec\u021bie juridic\u0103 dup\u0103 admitere \u0219i nou\u0103 decizie pe fond<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-besonderheiten-im-verwaltungsstrafverfahren\" data-level=\"2\">Particularit\u0103\u021bi \u00een procedura contraven\u021bional\u0103 administrativ\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-ihre-vorteile-mit-anwaltlicher-unterstutzung\" data-level=\"2\">Avantajele dumneavoastr\u0103 cu asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-haufig-gestellte-fragen-faq\" data-level=\"2\">\u00centreb\u0103ri frecvente \u2013 FAQ<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Redeschiderea procedurii administrative<\/strong> este o cale de atac extraordinar\u0103 reglementat\u0103 legal, prin care o <strong>procedur\u0103 \u00eencheiat\u0103 definitiv<\/strong> poate fi reluat\u0103 dac\u0103 exist\u0103 vicii grave. \u00cen principiu, dreptul administrativ protejeaz\u0103 <strong>securitatea juridic\u0103<\/strong>: odat\u0103 ce o decizie a devenit definitiv\u0103 din punct de vedere formal, cauza nu mai poate fi rejudecat\u0103. Doar atunci c\u00e2nd exist\u0103 motive speciale, men\u021bionate expres \u00een lege, cum ar fi o decizie ob\u021binut\u0103 fraudulos, fapte decisive nou ap\u0103rute sau o chestiune preliminar\u0103 apreciat\u0103 ulterior \u00een mod diferit, legea \u00eenl\u0103tur\u0103 aceast\u0103 for\u021b\u0103 obligatorie. Baza legal\u0103 se reg\u0103se\u0219te \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10005768\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>\u00a7<\/strong> <strong>69 \u0219i \u00a7<\/strong> <strong>70<\/strong> <strong>AVG<\/strong><\/a>. Aceasta serve\u0219te astfel drept <strong>corectiv pentru decizii cu erori grave<\/strong>, f\u0103r\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 a pune sub semnul \u00eentreb\u0103rii securitatea juridic\u0103.    <\/p>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-container uagb-block-3019fe8e alignfull uagb-is-root-container\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-container uagb-block-32585033\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Redeschiderea procedurii administrative<\/strong> permite, \u00een condi\u021biile stricte ale <strong>\u00a7<\/strong> <strong>69<\/strong> <strong>AVG<\/strong>, reluarea unei proceduri deja \u00eencheiate definitiv, dac\u0103 exist\u0103 erori deosebit de grave sau circumstan\u021be noi decisive.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-container uagb-block-45819ab6\"><picture>\n\t\t<source srcset=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-352x198.webp\" >\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-picture-small\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme.webp\" alt=\"Redeschiderea procedurii administrative conform \u00a7 69 AVG: condi\u021bii, termene \u0219i efecte explicate simplu.\" >\n\t<\/picture>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-peter-harlander\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/ph100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Peter Harlander<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eRedeschiderea \u00eenl\u0103tur\u0103 puterea de lucru judecat doar \u00een cazuri excep\u021bionale. Cine dore\u0219te s\u0103 o utilizeze cu succes trebuie s\u0103 prezinte precis de ce decizia ar fi fost diferit\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 aceast\u0103 eroare. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-bedeutung-und-zweck-der-wiederaufnahme\">Semnifica\u021bia \u0219i scopul redeschiderii<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea serve\u0219te drept <strong>corectiv pentru decizii gre\u0219ite grave<\/strong>. Aceasta urm\u0103re\u0219te s\u0103 previn\u0103 men\u021binerea unei decizii bazate pe fundamente eronate. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Legea urm\u0103re\u0219te dou\u0103 obiective:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Protec\u021bia securit\u0103\u021bii juridice<\/strong>, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t procedurile s\u0103 nu fie redeschise arbitrar<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Asigurarea justi\u021biei materiale<\/strong>, atunci c\u00e2nd ies la iveal\u0103 erori grave<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Doar atunci c\u00e2nd exist\u0103 un motiv de redeschidere clar definit, autoritatea poate relua procedura. Astfel, legea creeaz\u0103 un sistem echilibrat \u00eentre protec\u021bia deciziilor finalizate \u0219i erorile evidente. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pentru persoanele afectate, aceasta \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 redeschiderea este o <strong>excep\u021bie<\/strong>, dar foarte eficient\u0103. Aceasta poate elimina complet o decizie \u00eempov\u0103r\u0103toare \u0219i poate conduce la o nou\u0103 decizie. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ce control este posibil depinde de tipul procedurii. \u00cen cazul unei <strong>decizii<\/strong>, calea duce de obicei prin instan\u021ba administrativ\u0103 competent\u0103. Pentru <strong>deciziile<\/strong> unei instan\u021be administrative se aplic\u0103 reguli proprii ale <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=20008255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 32 VwGVG<\/a><\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-rechtsgrundlagen-nach-avg-und-abgrenzung-zu-anderen-rechtsbehelfen\">Baze legale conform AVG \u0219i delimitare fa\u021b\u0103 de alte c\u0103i de atac<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Baza legal\u0103 central\u0103 se reg\u0103se\u0219te \u00een <strong>\u00a7<\/strong> <strong>69 \u0219i \u00a7<\/strong> <strong>70<\/strong> <strong>Legea<\/strong> <strong>general\u0103 privind procedura administrativ\u0103<\/strong> (<strong>AVG<\/strong>). Aceste dispozi\u021bii reglementeaz\u0103 exact c\u00e2nd este admisibil\u0103 redeschiderea, ce termene se aplic\u0103 \u0219i cum trebuie s\u0103 procedeze autoritatea. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Este important\u0103 delimitarea clar\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de alte instrumente:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Contesta\u021biile \u00eempotriva deciziilor<\/strong> se aplic\u0103 \u00eenainte de intrarea \u00een puterea de lucru judecat<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Repunerea \u00een termenul<\/strong> ajut\u0103 \u00een cazul termenelor dep\u0103\u0219ite<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Anularea din oficiu conform \u00a7<\/strong> <strong>68<\/strong> <strong>AVG<\/strong> \u021bine de discre\u021bia autorit\u0103\u021bii<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea se diferen\u021biaz\u0103 clar. Aceasta presupune c\u0103 <strong>nu mai este deschis\u0103 nicio cale ordinar\u0103 de atac<\/strong>. Abia apoi autoritatea verific\u0103 dac\u0103 exist\u0103 unul dintre motivele de redeschidere reglementate legal.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Astfel se creeaz\u0103 un sistem structurat de protec\u021bie juridic\u0103. Ini\u021bial sunt disponibile c\u0103ile ordinare de atac. Ulterior r\u0103m\u00e2ne doar redeschiderea ca excep\u021bie strict limitat\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-voraussetzungen-der-wiederaufnahme\">Condi\u021biile redeschiderii<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea este admisibil\u0103 doar dac\u0103 sunt \u00eendeplinite <strong>mai multe condi\u021bii simultan<\/strong>. Legea stabile\u0219te \u00een mod deliberat praguri \u00eenalte, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t deciziile definitive s\u0103 nu fie puse \u00een discu\u021bie cu u\u0219urin\u021b\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea poate avea loc fie <strong>la cererea unei p\u0103r\u021bi<\/strong>, fie <strong>din oficiu<\/strong>. \u00cen cazul <strong>cererii<\/strong>, revine persoanei afectate sarcina de a <strong>invoca<\/strong> concret un motiv legal de redeschidere \u0219i de a-l <strong>face valabil<\/strong> \u00een termen. Autoritatea verific\u0103 apoi dac\u0103 sunt \u00eendeplinite condi\u021biile legale.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Redeschiderea din oficiu<\/strong> nu presupune o cerere a p\u0103r\u021bii. Aceasta intr\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bie atunci c\u00e2nd autoritatea \u00eens\u0103\u0219i ia cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de un motiv legal de redeschidere. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen primul r\u00e2nd, o procedur\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 fie \u00eencheiat\u0103 prin <strong>decizie<\/strong> \u0219i s\u0103 fie definitiv\u0103. Nu mai trebuie s\u0103 fie <strong>admisibil\u0103 nicio cale ordinar\u0103 de atac<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen plus, legea solicit\u0103 existen\u021ba unui <strong>motiv concret de redeschidere<\/strong>. Aceste motive sunt enumerate exhaustiv \u00een lege. Alte argumente, cum ar fi o simpl\u0103 evaluare nemul\u021bumitoare din partea autorit\u0103\u021bii, nu sunt suficiente.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cine solicit\u0103 o redeschidere trebuie s\u0103 prezinte clar:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ce <strong>ipotez\u0103 legal\u0103<\/strong> este \u00eendeplinit\u0103<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>de ce acest motiv se aplic\u0103 \u00een cazul concret<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>de ce decizia ini\u021bial\u0103 ar fi trebuit s\u0103 fie diferit\u0103<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-formelle-rechtskraft-und-abgeschlossener-bescheid\">Puterea de lucru judecat formal\u0103 \u0219i decizie finalizat\u0103<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Puterea de lucru judecat formal\u0103<\/strong> \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 \u00eempotriva unei decizii nu mai este deschis\u0103 nicio cale ordinar\u0103 de atac. Fie termenul a expirat, fie ultima instan\u021b\u0103 a decis deja. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De la acest moment, cauza este considerat\u0103 \u00een principiu \u00eencheiat\u0103. Se vorbe\u0219te despre a\u0219a-numitul <strong>lucru judecat<\/strong>. Autoritatea nu mai poate examina din nou aceea\u0219i chestiune.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tocmai de aceea redeschiderea reprezint\u0103 o <strong>\u00eenl\u0103turare a puterii de lucru judecat<\/strong>. Aceasta intervine doar dac\u0103 exist\u0103 motive legale speciale \u0219i nu protejeaz\u0103 \u00eempotriva propriilor omisiuni. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Important este:<br\/>O decizie devine definitiv\u0103 din punct de vedere formal chiar dac\u0103 o parte nu exercit\u0103 voluntar nicio cale de atac sau renun\u021b\u0103 expres la aceasta. Nemul\u021bumirea ulterioar\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de decizie nu \u00eenlocuie\u0219te un motiv de redeschidere. <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-wiederaufnahmegrunde-nach-69-avg\">Motive de redeschidere conform \u00a7 69 AVG<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Legea men\u021bioneaz\u0103 expres motivele de redeschidere \u00een <strong>\u00a7 69<\/strong> <strong>AVG<\/strong>. Aceast\u0103 enumerare este <strong>exhaustiv\u0103<\/strong>. Aceasta \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 alte motive nu intr\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bie.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoritatea distinge \u00een esen\u021b\u0103 patru situa\u021bii:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Decizia a fost <strong>ob\u021binut\u0103 fraudulos<\/strong> sau prin intermediul unei ac\u021biuni penale<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Apar <strong>fapte sau mijloace de prob\u0103 noi<\/strong> care existau deja, dar nu au fost prezentate f\u0103r\u0103 vin\u0103<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>O <strong>chestiune preliminar\u0103<\/strong> a fost solu\u021bionat\u0103 ulterior \u00een mod diferit de c\u0103tre instan\u021ba competent\u0103<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>O decizie anterioar\u0103 ar fi condus la <strong>invocarea lucrului judecat<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoritatea verific\u0103 deosebit de strict a\u0219a-numita ipotez\u0103 a nout\u0103\u021bii. Faptele noi trebuie s\u0103 fi existat deja \u00een procedura ini\u021bial\u0103. Circumstan\u021bele ap\u0103rute ulterior nu sunt suficiente.  <\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eRedeschiderea nu constituie astfel un instrument pentru a introduce ulterior evolu\u021bii noi. Aceasta corecteaz\u0103 doar erori care existau deja \u00een momentul deciziei ini\u021biale. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-wiederaufnahmegrunde-im-uberblick\">Motive de redeschidere \u2013 prezentare general\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Motivele de redeschidere constituie <strong>nucleul \u00eentregului instrument<\/strong>. F\u0103r\u0103 un motiv legal clar demonstrabil, decizia r\u0103m\u00e2ne \u00een vigoare. Legea men\u021bioneaz\u0103 ipotezele \u00een mod exhaustiv.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Acestea pot fi \u00eemp\u0103r\u021bite \u00een dou\u0103 grupuri:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Motive care au o gravitate deosebit\u0103 \u0219i conduc de obicei \u00een mod obligatoriu la redeschidere<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Motive la care se verific\u0103 suplimentar dac\u0103 decizia ar fi fost diferit\u0103<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Toate motivele de redeschidere trebuie \u00eens\u0103 s\u0103 fie <strong>relevante pentru decizie<\/strong>. Nu este suficient s\u0103 existe o eroare. Eroarea trebuie s\u0103 fie at\u00e2t de esen\u021bial\u0103 \u00eenc\u00e2t decizia ar fi fost probabil diferit\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 acest aspect.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cine depune o cerere ar trebui s\u0103 nu men\u021bioneze doar ipoteza legal\u0103, ci s\u0103 explice \u0219i de ce noua situa\u021bie ar fi condus la un <strong>dispozitiv diferit<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-erschleichung-und-gerichtlich-strafbare-handlungen\">Ob\u021binere frauduloas\u0103 \u0219i ac\u021biuni penale<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un motiv de redeschidere deosebit de grav exist\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd o decizie a fost <strong>ob\u021binut\u0103 fraudulos<\/strong> sau se bazeaz\u0103 pe o <strong>ac\u021biune penal\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Se vorbe\u0219te despre ob\u021binere frauduloas\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd o parte induce \u00een eroare \u00een mod inten\u021bionat autoritatea. Exemple tipice sunt:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>declara\u021bii false \u00een mod con\u0219tient cu privire la fapte esen\u021biale<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>prezentarea de documente falsificate<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>t\u0103inuirea circumstan\u021belor decisive cu inten\u021bia de a induce \u00een eroare<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoritatea trebuie s\u0103 fie convins\u0103 de ac\u021biunea penal\u0103. O simpl\u0103 suspiciune nu este suficient\u0103. O condamnare penal\u0103 nu este \u00eens\u0103 obligatoriu necesar\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Acest motiv de redeschidere are o gravitate deosebit\u0103, deoarece submineaz\u0103 \u00eencrederea \u00een procedur\u0103. Cine ob\u021bine o decizie prin \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune nu se poate baza pe men\u021binerea acesteia. <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-neu-hervorgekommene-tatsachen-und-beweismittel\">Fapte \u0219i mijloace de prob\u0103 nou ap\u0103rute<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cel mai frecvent motiv de redeschidere prive\u0219te <strong>faptele sau mijloacele de prob\u0103 nou ap\u0103rute<\/strong>. Aici se aplic\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 o restric\u021bie important\u0103: noile circumstan\u021be trebuie s\u0103 fi existat deja \u00een momentul procedurii ini\u021biale. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Se vorbe\u0219te despre a\u0219a-numitele fapte \u201eexistente deja, dar necunoscute\u201d. Acesta este cazul, de exemplu, atunci c\u00e2nd un document exista deja, dar nu a putut fi g\u0103sit f\u0103r\u0103 culp\u0103 \u0219i a ap\u0103rut abia mai t\u00e2rziu. Dezvolt\u0103rile ulterioare, cum ar fi o nou\u0103 expertiz\u0103, nu sunt suficiente.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen plus, partea nu trebuie s\u0103 aib\u0103 nicio vin\u0103 pentru neprezentarea faptului. Cine ar fi putut invoca un fapt cu aten\u021bie normal\u0103 nu se poate referi ulterior la acesta. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoritatea verific\u0103 astfel trei aspecte deosebit de atent:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Faptul exista deja?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nu a putut fi invocat f\u0103r\u0103 vin\u0103 proprie?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ar fi condus probabil la o decizie diferit\u0103?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Doar dac\u0103 toate cele trei criterii sunt \u00eendeplinite, redeschiderea intr\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-nachtraglich-anders-entschiedene-vorfrage\">Chestiune preliminar\u0103 solu\u021bionat\u0103 ulterior \u00een mod diferit<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unele decizii depind de o a\u0219a-numit\u0103 <strong>chestiune preliminar\u0103<\/strong>. Aceasta este o chestiune juridic\u0103 sau de fapt \u00een care o alt\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103 decide mai \u00eent\u00e2i asupra unui aspect de care autoritatea are nevoie pentru decizia sa. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exemplu: O autoriza\u021bie comercial\u0103 este retras\u0103 deoarece o alt\u0103 autoritate a constatat o anumit\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biilor. Dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 chestiune este apreciat\u0103 ulterior \u00een mod diferit de c\u0103tre instan\u021ba competent\u0103, se modific\u0103 fundamentul deciziei ini\u021biale. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pentru ca acest motiv de redeschidere s\u0103 fie aplicabil, trebuie \u00eendeplinite mai multe condi\u021bii:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Chestiunea preliminar\u0103 a fost <strong>decisiv\u0103<\/strong> pentru decizia ini\u021bial\u0103<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Decizia ulterioar\u0103 provine de la <strong>autoritatea competent\u0103 sau de la instan\u021ba competent\u0103<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Noua decizie difer\u0103 \u00een aspecte esen\u021biale<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nu este suficient ca doar o opinie juridic\u0103 s\u0103 se fi schimbat. Noua decizie trebuie s\u0103 aib\u0103 efecte concrete asupra aprecierii \u00een procedura principal\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-nachtraglich-bekannt-gewordene-entscheidung-und-entschiedene-sache\">Decizie cunoscut\u0103 ulterior \u0219i lucru judecat<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un alt motiv de redeschidere exist\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd ulterior devine cunoscut\u0103 o <strong>decizie anterioar\u0103<\/strong> care \u00een procedura ini\u021bial\u0103 ar fi condus la a\u0219a-numita <strong>invocare a lucrului judecat<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lucrul judecat \u00eenseamn\u0103: asupra aceluia\u0219i fapt nu se poate decide de dou\u0103 ori. Dac\u0103 exista deja o decizie definitiv\u0103 sau o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103, autoritatea ar fi trebuit s\u0103 resping\u0103 procedura ulterioar\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 o astfel de decizie anterioar\u0103 devine cunoscut\u0103 abia ulterior, partea poate solicita o redeschidere.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Se presupune \u00eens\u0103:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Decizia anterioar\u0103 este ea \u00eens\u0103\u0219i <strong>definitiv\u0103<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nu mai poate fi modificat\u0103 la cerere<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Prive\u0219te <strong>aceea\u0219i cauz\u0103<\/strong> \u00eentr-un mod relevant pentru decizie<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aceast\u0103 ipotez\u0103 protejeaz\u0103 \u00eempotriva deciziilor contradictorii \u0219i consolideaz\u0103 securitatea juridic\u0103.<\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-peter-harlander\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/ph100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Peter Harlander<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eO redeschidere presupune mai mult dec\u00e2t \u00eendoieli cu privire la decizie. Decisiv este dac\u0103 \u00een cazul concret se poate prezenta clar \u0219i comprehensibil un motiv legal de redeschidere solid. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-fristen-und-antragstellung\">Termene \u0219i depunerea cererii<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-zweiwochige-frist-ab-kenntnis-des-wiederaufnahmegrundes\">Termen de dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni de la cunoa\u0219terea motivului de redeschidere<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cel mai important termen \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu redeschiderea este de <strong>dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni<\/strong>. Acesta \u00eencepe \u00een momentul \u00een care partea ia cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de motivul de redeschidere. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Decisiv nu este deci c\u00e2nd noua circumstan\u021b\u0103 a ap\u0103rut obiectiv, ci c\u00e2nd persoana afectat\u0103 a <strong>aflat efectiv<\/strong> despre aceasta. Partea trebuie s\u0103 fac\u0103 plauzibil c\u00e2nd a luat cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de noua circumstan\u021b\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cine depune o cerere trebuie s\u0103 prezinte \u00een mod comprehensibil:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>c\u00e2nd a intervenit cunoa\u0219terea<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>prin ce a fost ob\u021binut\u0103<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>de ce depunerea cererii a avut loc \u00een termen de dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoritatea verific\u0103 aceste informa\u021bii cu aten\u021bie. O simpl\u0103 afirma\u021bie nu este suficient\u0103. Dac\u0103 termenul este dep\u0103\u0219it, autoritatea respinge cererea f\u0103r\u0103 a examina mai departe con\u021binutul.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tocmai de aceea persoanele afectate ar trebui s\u0103 ia imediat m\u0103suri juridice dup\u0103 ce iau cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de fapte noi.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-absolute-dreijahresfrist-und-ausnahmen\">Termen absolut de trei ani \u0219i excep\u021bii<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 termenul de dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni se aplic\u0103 un <strong>termen maxim absolut de trei ani<\/strong> de la comunicare sau pronun\u021bare oral\u0103 a deciziei. Dup\u0103 expirarea acestui termen, o parte nu mai poate solicita redeschiderea. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Acest termen serve\u0219te <strong>securit\u0103\u021bii juridice<\/strong>. Chiar \u0219i erorile grave \u00ee\u0219i pierd dup\u0103 o anumit\u0103 perioad\u0103 for\u021ba de \u00eenl\u0103turare, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t raporturile juridice s\u0103 nu r\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een suspensie pe termen nelimitat. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O excep\u021bie important\u0103 prive\u0219te <strong>ob\u021binerea frauduloas\u0103 sau ac\u021biunea penal\u0103<\/strong>. \u00cen astfel de cazuri, autoritatea poate ac\u021biona din oficiu \u00een anumite condi\u021bii chiar \u0219i dup\u0103 expirarea celor trei ani. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Respectarea acestui termen maxim decide astfel asupra admisibilit\u0103\u021bii \u00eentregii proceduri.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-zustandige-behorde-und-richtige-einbringungsstelle\">Autoritatea competent\u0103 \u0219i locul corect de depunere<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cererea de redeschidere trebuie depus\u0103 la autoritatea care a emis decizia \u00een <strong>prim\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103<\/strong>. Aceast\u0103 autoritate prime\u0219te cererea \u0219i o \u00eenainteaz\u0103 \u00een procedur\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Despre admiterea sau respingerea decide \u00eens\u0103 autoritatea care a emis decizia <strong>\u00een ultima instan\u021b\u0103<\/strong>. Astfel se men\u021bine nivelul decizional care a fost responsabil \u0219i pentru puterea de lucru judecat ini\u021bial\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Este important\u0103 o depunere corect\u0103:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>depunerea cererii \u00een scris<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>indicarea clar\u0103 a deciziei atacate<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>prezentarea exact\u0103 a motivului de redeschidere invocat<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eErorile de form\u0103 sau indica\u021biile neclare pot \u00eent\u00e2rzia considerabil procedura sau pot conduce la respingere. O depunere structurat\u0103 \u0219i precis\u0103 a cererii constituie astfel baza pentru orice redeschidere reu\u0219it\u0103. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ablauf-und-entscheidung-im-wiederaufnahmeverfahren\">Desf\u0103\u0219urarea \u0219i decizia \u00een procedura de redeschidere<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Desf\u0103\u0219urarea redeschiderii urmeaz\u0103 structuri legale clare. Dup\u0103 depunerea cererii, autoritatea verific\u0103 mai \u00eent\u00e2i condi\u021biile formale \u0219i apoi existen\u021ba unui motiv legal de redeschidere. Abia dup\u0103 dep\u0103\u0219irea acestor praguri, aceasta continu\u0103 procedura \u00een limitele stabilite. Procedura nu serve\u0219te unei relu\u0103ri complete, ci unei <strong>corec\u021bii \u021bintite a unei erori calificate<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-prufung-und-entscheidungsarten-der-behorde\">Verificarea \u0219i tipurile de decizii ale autorit\u0103\u021bii<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dup\u0103 primirea cererii, autoritatea verific\u0103 mai \u00eent\u00e2i <strong>condi\u021biile formale<\/strong>. Aceasta controleaz\u0103 dac\u0103 termenele au fost respectate, dac\u0103 cererea provine de la o parte \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 \u0219i dac\u0103 este invocat un motiv legal de redeschidere. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Abia apoi se ocup\u0103 de <strong>sus\u021binerile de fond<\/strong>. \u00cen acest context evalueaz\u0103 dac\u0103 motivul invocat exist\u0103 efectiv \u0219i dac\u0103 este apt s\u0103 modifice decizia ini\u021bial\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoritatea poate solu\u021biona cererea \u00een trei moduri:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Respingere<\/strong>, dac\u0103 lipsesc condi\u021biile formale<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Respingere ca nefondat\u0103<\/strong>, dac\u0103 nu exist\u0103 un motiv de redeschidere valabil<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Admitere<\/strong>, dac\u0103 toate criteriile legale sunt \u00eendeplinite<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aceast\u0103 distinc\u021bie este important\u0103. O respingere prive\u0219te doar vicii formale. O respingere ca nefondat\u0103 \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 autoritatea a examinat cererea pe fond \u0219i a considerat-o ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-inhalt-des-wiederaufnahmebescheids-nach-70-avg\">Con\u021binutul deciziei de redeschidere conform \u00a7 70 AVG<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 autoritatea admite redeschiderea, aceasta anuleaz\u0103 decizia ini\u021bial\u0103. Simultan trebuie s\u0103 stabileasc\u0103 <strong>\u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 \u0219i la ce nivel<\/strong> se continu\u0103 procedura. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Decizia con\u021bine astfel declara\u021bii clare cu privire la:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ce p\u0103r\u021bi ale procedurii trebuie reluate<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 probele anterioare trebuie administrate din nou<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 poate fi emis\u0103 deja o nou\u0103 decizie pe fond<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nu fiecare verificare este repetat\u0103 automat. Administr\u0103rile de probe anterioare r\u0103m\u00e2n valabile, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care nu sunt afectate de motivul de redeschidere. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea nu conduce astfel la un nou \u00eenceput complet, ci la o <strong>corec\u021bie \u021bintit\u0103<\/strong> a aspectelor problematice.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-wirkung-auf-den-bisherigen-bescheid-und-fortsetzung-des-verfahrens\">Efectul asupra deciziei anterioare \u0219i continuarea procedurii<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Odat\u0103 cu admiterea, decizia ini\u021bial\u0103 \u00eenceteaz\u0103 s\u0103 mai produc\u0103 efecte <strong>ex tunc<\/strong>. Aceasta \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 din punct de vedere juridic este considerat\u0103 ca nemaifiind valabil\u0103 de la \u00eenceput. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ulterior, autoritatea continu\u0103 procedura \u00een limitele stabilite. Aceasta completeaz\u0103 verific\u0103rile, administreaz\u0103 probe noi sau reevalueaz\u0103 situa\u021bia de fapt. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La final se emite o <strong>nou\u0103 decizie<\/strong> care \u00eenlocuie\u0219te pe cea anterioar\u0103. Aceast\u0103 nou\u0103 decizie poate fi la r\u00e2ndul ei atacat\u0103 cu c\u0103ile de atac prev\u0103zute. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea produce astfel o reevaluare deplin\u0103 \u00een limite legale clare. Aceasta creeaz\u0103 posibilitatea de a corecta erori grave, f\u0103r\u0103 a submina \u00eentregul sistem al puterii de lucru judecat. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-rechtsschutz-nach-der-entscheidung\">Protec\u021bie juridic\u0103 dup\u0103 decizie<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0218i \u00een procedura de redeschidere r\u0103m\u00e2ne garantat\u0103 <strong>protec\u021bia juridic\u0103<\/strong>. Dac\u0103 cererea este respins\u0103 sau respins\u0103 ca nefondat\u0103, partea poate solicita verificarea judiciar\u0103 a acestei decizii. Dac\u0103 redeschiderea este admis\u0103 \u0219i ulterior se emite o nou\u0103 decizie, \u0219i aceasta este supus\u0103 c\u0103ilor ordinare de atac.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-rechtsmittel-gegen-die-ablehnung\">C\u0103i de atac \u00eempotriva respingerii<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 autoritatea respinge cererea de redeschidere sau o respinge ca nefondat\u0103, p\u0103r\u021bii afectate \u00eei revine <strong>protec\u021bie juridic\u0103<\/strong>. Decizia nu r\u0103m\u00e2ne astfel definitiv necontrolabil\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cempotriva unei decizii de respingere poate fi formulat\u0103 de regul\u0103 o <strong>contesta\u021bie la instan\u021ba administrativ\u0103 competent\u0103<\/strong>. Instan\u021ba verific\u0103 dac\u0103 autoritatea a aplicat corect condi\u021biile legale. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen acest context, instan\u021ba administrativ\u0103 controleaz\u0103 \u00een special:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>dac\u0103 un motiv legal de redeschidere a fost apreciat corect<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 termenele au fost calculate corect<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 au fost respectate dispozi\u021biile procedurale<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instan\u021ba nu \u00eenlocuie\u0219te automat decizia cu o nou\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2re de fond. Mai \u00eent\u00e2i, aceasta verific\u0103 dac\u0103 respingerea a fost legal\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O cerere structurat\u0103 \u0219i bine fundamentat\u0103 faciliteaz\u0103 semnificativ aplicarea legii chiar \u0219i \u00een procedura de recurs.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-rechtsschutz-nach-bewilligung-und-neuer-sachentscheidung\">Protec\u021bie juridic\u0103 dup\u0103 aprobare \u0219i o nou\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2re de fond<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 redeschiderea este aprobat\u0103, urmeaz\u0103 o nou\u0103 procedur\u0103 de fond. La final, autoritatea emite o <strong>nou\u0103 decizie<\/strong>, care o \u00eenlocuie\u0219te pe cea veche. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cempotriva acestei noi decizii sunt disponibile <strong>c\u0103ile de atac obi\u0219nuite<\/strong>. Partea o poate contesta, ca pe orice alt\u0103 decizie, prin recurs. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Este important\u0103 o distinc\u021bie clar\u0103:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Aprobarea redeschiderii \u00een sine nu poate fi contestat\u0103 izolat \u00een anumite constela\u021bii<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Noua hot\u0103r\u00e2re de fond este \u00eens\u0103 pe deplin supus\u0103 protec\u021biei juridice regulate<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cine este nemul\u021bumit doar de noul con\u021binut trebuie s\u0103 se adreseze \u00eempotriva noii decizii. Dac\u0103 partea rateaz\u0103 acest termen, \u0219i noua decizie devine definitiv\u0103. <\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-peter-harlander\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/ph100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Peter Harlander<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eNici \u00een procedura de redeschidere protec\u021bia juridic\u0103 nu se \u00eencheie. At\u00e2t respingerea, c\u00e2t \u0219i noua hot\u0103r\u00e2re de fond sunt supuse c\u0103ilor de atac \u0219i termenelor prev\u0103zute de lege. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-besonderheiten-im-verwaltungsstrafverfahren\">Particularit\u0103\u021bi \u00een procedura administrativ\u0103 penal\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Redeschiderea este posibil\u0103 nu numai \u00een cazul <strong>deciziilor autorit\u0103\u021bii<\/strong>, ci \u0219i \u00een cazul <strong>hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor \u0219i deciziilor instan\u021belor administrative<\/strong>. O procedur\u0103 administrativ\u0103 judiciar\u0103 deja \u00eencheiat\u0103 definitiv poate fi redeschis\u0103 doar \u00een baza <strong>motivului de redeschidere enumerat taxativ de lege<\/strong> din <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=20008255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 32 VwGVG<\/a><\/strong>. <strong>Cererea trebuie depus\u0103 \u00een termen de dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni<\/strong> de la data la care s-a luat cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de motivul de redeschidere <strong>la instan\u021ba administrativ\u0103<\/strong>; \u00een plus, se aplic\u0103 un <strong>termen absolut de trei ani<\/strong> de la pronun\u021barea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii. Astfel, \u0219i \u00een procedura judiciar\u0103, redeschiderea r\u0103m\u00e2ne o <strong>excep\u021bie strict\u0103<\/strong>, care \u00eencalc\u0103 autoritatea de lucru judecat doar \u00een cazul unor motive clare, demonstrabile \u0219i relevante pentru decizie.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen <strong>procedura administrativ\u0103 penal\u0103<\/strong> se aplic\u0103 particularit\u0103\u021bi suplimentare. De\u0219i principiile generale ale redeschiderii se aplic\u0103 \u0219i aici, exist\u0103 termene speciale. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 o procedur\u0103 administrativ\u0103 penal\u0103 este \u00eenchis\u0103, o redeschidere poate avea loc doar \u00een cadrul <strong>termenului de prescrip\u021bie a urm\u0103ririi penale<\/strong>. \u00cen multe cazuri, acest termen este de un an de la fapt\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prin aceasta, legea dore\u0219te s\u0103 \u00eempiedice redeschiderea nelimitat\u0103 a procedurilor penale.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0218i aici se aplic\u0103: redeschiderea nu este un substitut pentru o cale de atac ratat\u0103. Ea corecteaz\u0103 doar erori calificate sau circumstan\u021be noi decisive. Mai ales \u00een domeniul penal, autorit\u0103\u021bile verific\u0103 cu o rigoare deosebit\u0103 dac\u0103 sunt \u00eendeplinite efectiv condi\u021biile legale.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ihre-vorteile-mit-anwaltlicher-unterstutzung\">Avantajele dumneavoastr\u0103 cu asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Redeschiderea \u00een procedura administrativ\u0103<\/strong> nu este o a doua \u00eencercare la \u00eent\u00e2mplare. Ea intervine doar \u00een cazul unor condi\u021bii legale clar definite. Cine argumenteaz\u0103 imprecis sau rateaz\u0103 termenele, \u00ee\u0219i pierde definitiv \u0219ansa.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un avocat experimentat verific\u0103 mai \u00eent\u00e2i dac\u0103 exist\u0103 \u00eentr-adev\u0103r un motiv valabil de redeschidere. El evalueaz\u0103 dac\u0103 faptele noi sunt considerate cu adev\u0103rat \u201eap\u0103rute recent\u201d sau dac\u0103 o chestiune preliminar\u0103 a fost decis\u0103 definitiv diferit. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, el respect\u0103 strict <strong>termenul limit\u0103<\/strong>, pentru ca cererea s\u0103 nu e\u0219ueze din motive formale.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Avantajele dumneavoastr\u0103 concrete:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Verificare juridic\u0103 sigur\u0103<\/strong> dac\u0103 sunt \u00eendeplinite efectiv condi\u021biile legale conform \u00a7 69 AVG<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Respectarea termenelor \u0219i depunerea cererii \u00een form\u0103 legal\u0103<\/strong>, pentru ca nicio eroare formal\u0103 s\u0103 nu v\u0103 sl\u0103beasc\u0103 pozi\u021bia<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Reprezentare strategic\u0103 \u00een procedura ulterioar\u0103<\/strong>, \u00een special \u00een cazul unei noi hot\u0103r\u00e2ri de fond sau a unui recurs<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eTocmai pentru c\u0103 redeschiderea \u00eencalc\u0103 autoritatea de lucru judecat, autoritatea verific\u0103 cu o rigoare deosebit\u0103. Cu o asisten\u021b\u0103 profesional\u0103, v\u0103 consolida\u021bi pozi\u021bia de la \u00eenceput \u0219i evita\u021bi deciziile gre\u0219ite costisitoare. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-haufig-gestellte-fragen-faq\">\u00centreb\u0103ri frecvente \u2013 FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq uagb-faq__outer-wrap uagb-block-972c8b74 uagb-faq-icon-row uagb-faq-layout-accordion uagb-faq-expand-first-true uagb-faq-inactive-other-true uagb-faq__wrap uagb-buttons-layout-wrap uagb-faq-equal-height     \" data-faqtoggle=\"true\" role=\"tablist\"><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/harlander-partner.eu\\\/ro\\\/drept-penal\\\/redeschiderea-procedurii-administrative\\\/\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Ce este redeschiderea \\u00een procedura administrativ\\u0103?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Redeschiderea este o modalitate reglementat\\u0103 legal de a solicita reexaminarea unei proceduri deja \\u00eencheiate definitiv. Acest lucru este posibil doar \\u00een cazuri excep\\u021bionale strict limitate, de exemplu \\u00een cazul unor fapte decisive nou ap\\u0103rute sau dac\\u0103 decizia a fost ob\\u021binut\\u0103 prin \\u00een\\u0219el\\u0103ciune. \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"C\\u00e2nd merit\\u0103 o cerere de redeschidere?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"O cerere merit\\u0103 doar dac\\u0103 exist\\u0103 un motiv legal de redeschidere \\u0219i acesta poate influen\\u021ba con\\u021binutul deciziei. Simpla nemul\\u021bumire fa\\u021b\\u0103 de decizie sau o alt\\u0103 opinie juridic\\u0103 ulterioar\\u0103 nu sunt suficiente. \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Ce termene trebuie s\\u0103 respect \\u00een cazul redeschiderii?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Cererea trebuie depus\\u0103 \\u00een termen de dou\\u0103 s\\u0103pt\\u0103m\\u00e2ni de la data la care a\\u021bi luat cuno\\u0219tin\\u021b\\u0103 de motivul de redeschidere. \\u00cen plus, se aplic\\u0103 \\u00een principiu un termen maxim de trei ani de la comunicarea sau pronun\\u021barea deciziei. Dac\\u0103 termenele sunt ratate, cererea e\\u0219ueaz\\u0103 de obicei deja din motive formale.  \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Ce se consider\\u0103 fapt nou sau prob\\u0103 nou\\u0103?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Nou se consider\\u0103 doar ceea ce exista deja \\u00een procedura ini\\u021bial\\u0103, dar nu a putut fi prezentat f\\u0103r\\u0103 culp\\u0103 proprie. Circumstan\\u021bele ap\\u0103rute ulterior nu ajut\\u0103. \\u00cen plus, noul material trebuie s\\u0103 fie at\\u00e2t de important \\u00eenc\\u00e2t decizia ar fi fost probabil diferit\\u0103.  \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"O cerere de redeschidere are efect suspensiv?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Nu. Decizia ini\\u021bial\\u0103 r\\u0103m\\u00e2ne ini\\u021bial valabil\\u0103. Doar dac\\u0103 autoritatea aprob\\u0103 redeschiderea, vechea decizie este anulat\\u0103 \\u0219i procedura este continuat\\u0103 \\u00een m\\u0103sura stabilit\\u0103. \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Ce se \\u00eent\\u00e2mpl\\u0103 dup\\u0103 aprobarea redeschiderii?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Dup\\u0103 aprobare, autoritatea continu\\u0103 procedura \\u00een m\\u0103sura stabilit\\u0103 \\u00een decizia de redeschidere. Ulterior, emite o nou\\u0103 decizie. \\u00cempotriva acestei noi decizii sunt disponibile, \\u00een principiu, c\\u0103ile de atac obi\\u0219nuite.  \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Exist\\u0103 particularit\\u0103\\u021bi \\u00een procedura administrativ\\u0103 penal\\u0103?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Da. \\u00cen procedura administrativ\\u0103 penal\\u0103 pot exista termene suplimentare, \\u00een special \\u00een leg\\u0103tur\\u0103 cu prescrip\\u021bia urm\\u0103ririi penale. Prin aceasta se urm\\u0103re\\u0219te \\u00eempiedicarea redeschiderii nelimitate a procedurilor penale \\u00eenchise sau finalizate. \"}}]}<\/script><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-a1f3c2d4 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Ce este redeschiderea \u00een procedura administrativ\u0103?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Redeschiderea este o modalitate reglementat\u0103 legal de a solicita reexaminarea unei proceduri deja \u00eencheiate definitiv. Acest lucru este posibil doar \u00een cazuri excep\u021bionale strict limitate, de exemplu \u00een cazul unor fapte decisive nou ap\u0103rute sau dac\u0103 decizia a fost ob\u021binut\u0103 prin \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune. <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-b7e4d9a1 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">C\u00e2nd merit\u0103 o cerere de redeschidere?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>O cerere merit\u0103 doar dac\u0103 exist\u0103 un motiv legal de redeschidere \u0219i acesta poate influen\u021ba con\u021binutul deciziei. Simpla nemul\u021bumire fa\u021b\u0103 de decizie sau o alt\u0103 opinie juridic\u0103 ulterioar\u0103 nu sunt suficiente. <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-c9a2f1b6 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Ce termene trebuie s\u0103 respect \u00een cazul redeschiderii?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Cererea trebuie depus\u0103 \u00een termen de dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni de la data la care a\u021bi luat cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 de motivul de redeschidere. \u00cen plus, se aplic\u0103 \u00een principiu un termen maxim de trei ani de la comunicarea sau pronun\u021barea deciziei. Dac\u0103 termenele sunt ratate, cererea e\u0219ueaz\u0103 de obicei deja din motive formale.  <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-d3b8a6c0 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Ce se consider\u0103 fapt nou sau prob\u0103 nou\u0103?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Nou se consider\u0103 doar ceea ce exista deja \u00een procedura ini\u021bial\u0103, dar nu a putut fi prezentat f\u0103r\u0103 culp\u0103 proprie. Circumstan\u021bele ap\u0103rute ulterior nu ajut\u0103. \u00cen plus, noul material trebuie s\u0103 fie at\u00e2t de important \u00eenc\u00e2t decizia ar fi fost probabil diferit\u0103.  <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-e5c1d4f2 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">O cerere de redeschidere are efect suspensiv?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Nu. Decizia ini\u021bial\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2ne ini\u021bial valabil\u0103. Doar dac\u0103 autoritatea aprob\u0103 redeschiderea, vechea decizie este anulat\u0103 \u0219i procedura este continuat\u0103 \u00een m\u0103sura stabilit\u0103. <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-f6a9b2d3 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Ce se \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103 dup\u0103 aprobarea redeschiderii?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Dup\u0103 aprobare, autoritatea continu\u0103 procedura \u00een m\u0103sura stabilit\u0103 \u00een decizia de redeschidere. Ulterior, emite o nou\u0103 decizie. \u00cempotriva acestei noi decizii sunt disponibile, \u00een principiu, c\u0103ile de atac obi\u0219nuite.  <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-a8d4c3b1 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Exist\u0103 particularit\u0103\u021bi \u00een procedura administrativ\u0103 penal\u0103?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Da. \u00cen procedura administrativ\u0103 penal\u0103 pot exista termene suplimentare, \u00een special \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu prescrip\u021bia urm\u0103ririi penale. Prin aceasta se urm\u0103re\u0219te \u00eempiedicarea redeschiderii nelimitate a procedurilor penale \u00eenchise sau finalizate. <\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Redeschiderea procedurii administrative este o cale de atac extraordinar\u0103 reglementat\u0103 legal, prin care o procedur\u0103 \u00eencheiat\u0103 definitiv poate fi reluat\u0103 dac\u0103 exist\u0103 vicii grave. \u00cen principiu, dreptul administrativ protejeaz\u0103 securitatea &#8230;","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":126243,"parent":45855,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1529],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-126241","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-drept-penal-administrativ"],"acf":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme.webp",1920,1080,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-100x100.webp",100,100,true],"medium":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-800x450.webp",800,450,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme.webp",1920,1080,false],"large":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme.webp",1920,1080,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-1536x864.webp",1536,864,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme.webp",1920,1080,false],"336x":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-336x189.webp",336,189,true],"352x":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-352x198.webp",352,198,true],"woocommerce_thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-300x300.webp",300,300,true],"woocommerce_single":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-600x338.webp",600,338,true],"woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-100x100.webp",100,100,true],"yarpp-thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/wiederaufnahme-120x120.webp",120,120,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Victoria Schartner","author_link":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/author\/victoria-schartner\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Redeschiderea procedurii administrative este o cale de atac extraordinar\u0103 reglementat\u0103 legal, prin care o procedur\u0103 \u00eencheiat\u0103 definitiv poate fi reluat\u0103 dac\u0103 exist\u0103 vicii grave. \u00cen principiu, dreptul administrativ protejeaz\u0103 securitatea ...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/126241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/126241\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/45855"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}