{"id":110918,"date":"2026-01-05T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/drept-penal\/abuz-de-incredere\/"},"modified":"2026-01-07T00:18:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-06T23:18:10","slug":"abuz-de-incredere","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/drept-penal\/abuz-de-incredere\/","title":{"rendered":"Abuz de \u00eencredere"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-table-of-contents yoast-table-of-contents\"><h2>  Abuz de \u00eencredere<\/h2><ul><li><a href=\"#h-untreue\" data-level=\"2\">Abuz de \u00eencredere<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-objektiver-tatbestand\" data-level=\"2\">Situa\u021bia de fapt obiectiv\u0103<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-prufungsschritte\" data-level=\"3\">Pa\u0219i de verificare<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-abgrenzung-zu-anderen-delikten\" data-level=\"2\">Delimitarea de alte infrac\u021biuni<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-konkurrenzen\" data-level=\"3\">Concuren\u021be:<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-beweislast-amp-beweiswurdigung\" data-level=\"2\">Sarcina probei \u0219i aprecierea probelor<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-staatsanwaltschaft\" data-level=\"3\">Parchet:<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-gericht\" data-level=\"3\">Instan\u021b\u0103:<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-beschuldigte-person\" data-level=\"3\">Persoan\u0103 acuzat\u0103:<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-praxisbeispiele\" data-level=\"2\">Exemple practice<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-subjektiver-tatbestand\" data-level=\"2\">Situa\u021bia de fapt subiectiv\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-schuld-amp-irrtumer\" data-level=\"2\">Vinov\u0103\u021bie \u0219i erori<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-strafaufhebung-amp-diversion\" data-level=\"2\">Anularea pedepsei \u0219i abaterea<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-diversion\" data-level=\"3\">Diversiunea:<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-ausschluss-der-diversion\" data-level=\"3\">Excluderea diversific\u0103rii:<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-strafzumessung-amp-folgen\" data-level=\"2\">Stabilirea pedepsei \u0219i consecin\u021be<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-erschwerungsgrunde-bestehen-insbesondere-wenn\" data-level=\"3\">Motivele agravante exist\u0103 \u00een special dac\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-milderungsgrunde-sind-etwa\" data-level=\"3\">Motivele atenuante sunt, de exemplu<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-strafrahmen\" data-level=\"2\">Limitele pedepsei<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-geldstrafe-tagessatzsystem\" data-level=\"2\">Amenda \u2013 sistemul de cote zilnice<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-freiheitsstrafe-amp-teil-bedingte-nachsicht\" data-level=\"2\">Pedeapsa cu \u00eenchisoarea \u0219i clemen\u021b\u0103 (par\u021bial) condi\u021bionat\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-zustandigkeit-der-gerichte\" data-level=\"2\">Competen\u021ba instan\u021belor<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-sachliche-zustandigkeit\" data-level=\"3\">Competen\u021ba material\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-ortliche-zustandigkeit\" data-level=\"3\">Competen\u021ba teritorial\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-instanzenzug\" data-level=\"3\">Calea de atac<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-zivilanspruche-im-strafverfahren\" data-level=\"2\">Preten\u021bii civile \u00een cadrul procesului penal<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-strafverfahren-im-uberblick\" data-level=\"2\">Procesul penal pe scurt<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#h-ermittlungsbeginn\" data-level=\"3\">\u00cenceputul anchetei<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-polizei-und-staatsanwaltschaft\" data-level=\"3\">Poli\u021bia \u0219i Parchetul<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-beschuldigtenvernehmung\" data-level=\"3\">Audierea inculpatului<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-akteneinsicht\" data-level=\"3\">Inspectarea dosarului<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-hauptverhandlung\" data-level=\"3\">Procesul principal<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-beschuldigtenrechte\" data-level=\"2\">Drepturile inculpatului<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-praxis-amp-verhaltenstipps\" data-level=\"2\">Practic\u0103 \u0219i sfaturi de comportament<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-ihre-vorteile-mit-anwaltlicher-unterstutzung\" data-level=\"2\">Avantajele dumneavoastr\u0103 cu asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#h-faq-haufig-gestellte-fragen\" data-level=\"2\">\u00centreb\u0103ri frecvente<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-untreue\">Abuz de \u00eencredere<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exist\u0103 un abuz de \u00eencredere conform <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10002296&amp;Artikel=&amp;Paragraf=153&amp;Anlage=&amp;Uebergangsrecht=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 153 StGB<\/a><\/strong> dac\u0103 o persoan\u0103 <strong>\u00ee\u0219i abuzeaz\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 de o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103 de a dispune de averea altuia sau de a obliga legal o alt\u0103 persoan\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i, prin aceasta, <strong>prejudiciaz\u0103 persoana \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 din punct de vedere economic la avere<\/strong>. Elementul constitutiv presupune c\u0103 <strong>exist\u0103 o obliga\u021bie special\u0103 de administrare a averii<\/strong> \u0219i c\u0103 aceasta este <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcat\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil<\/strong>. Relevant\u0103 <strong>nu este orice \u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biilor<\/strong>, ci doar un <strong>abuz grav de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>, care serve\u0219te <strong>protec\u021biei averii str\u0103ine<\/strong>. <strong>Prejudiciul patrimonial trebuie s\u0103 fie tocmai o consecin\u021b\u0103 a acestui abuz<\/strong>. Decisiv este, astfel, <strong>modul \u00een care se gestioneaz\u0103 \u00een mod abuziv puterea de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie \u00eencredin\u021bat\u0103<\/strong>.    <\/p>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-container uagb-block-f014c6a5 alignfull uagb-is-root-container\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-container uagb-block-60e61cc5\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exist\u0103 abuz de \u00eencredere dac\u0103 cineva <strong>abuseaz\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 de o competen\u021b\u0103 \u00eencredin\u021bat\u0103 asupra averii altuia<\/strong> \u0219i, prin aceasta, <strong>cauzeaz\u0103 un prejudiciu patrimonial<\/strong>. Caracteristic\u0103 este <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcarea unei obliga\u021bii speciale de administrare a averii<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>nu o \u00een\u0219elare a persoanei prejudiciate<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-container uagb-block-613eb3e6\"><picture>\n\t\t<source srcset=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-352x198.webp\" >\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-picture-small\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue.webp\" alt=\"Abuzul de \u00eencredere conform \u00a7 153 StGB explicat. Elemente constitutive, prejudiciu patrimonial, limitele pedepsei \u0219i cazuri practice de abuz de \u00eencredere \u00een dreptul penal austriac.\" >\n\t<\/picture>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eUn abuz de \u00eencredere penal nu exist\u0103 la orice \u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biilor, ci doar atunci c\u00e2nd o competen\u021b\u0103 patrimonial\u0103 \u00eencredin\u021bat\u0103 este folosit\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u0219i \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil \u00een detrimentul persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-objektiver-tatbestand\">Situa\u021bia de fapt obiectiv\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Elementul constitutiv obiectiv<\/strong> cuprinde exclusiv <strong>evenimentul perceptibil din exterior<\/strong>. Relevante sunt <strong>competen\u021ba acordat\u0103<\/strong>, <strong>abuzul acesteia<\/strong>, precum \u0219i <strong>prejudiciul patrimonial survenit<\/strong>. <strong>Procesele interne<\/strong>, cum ar fi motivele sau inten\u021bia, nu sunt luate \u00een considerare la acest nivel. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Elementul constitutiv obiectiv al <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong> presupune ca autorul s\u0103 <strong>dispun\u0103 de o competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong> de a <strong>dispune de averea altuia sau de a obliga o alt\u0103 persoan\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i s\u0103 <strong>abuseze de aceasta \u00een mod abuziv<\/strong>. Spre deosebire de \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune, prejudiciul patrimonial <strong>nu se produce prin \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune<\/strong>, ci <strong>prin exercitarea nepermis\u0103 a unei puteri de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie existente<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un <strong>abuz de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong> exist\u0103 doar dac\u0103 autorul <strong>\u00eencalc\u0103 \u00een mod inacceptabil reguli de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong>. <strong>Nu este suficient\u0103 orice \u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biilor<\/strong>. Este necesar\u0103 o <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcare obiectiv grav\u0103<\/strong>, care are ca scop protec\u021bia averii str\u0103ine. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Prejudiciul patrimonial<\/strong> trebuie s\u0103 fie <strong>o consecin\u021b\u0103 direct\u0103 a abuzului de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>. Elementul constitutiv obiectiv este <strong>deja \u00eendeplinit<\/strong>, de \u00eendat\u0103 ce, prin gestionarea abuziv\u0103 a competen\u021bei, se produce un dezavantaj patrimonial pentru persoana \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 din punct de vedere economic. O <strong>\u00eembog\u0103\u021bire efectiv\u0103 a autorului<\/strong> nu este necesar\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-prufungsschritte\">Pa\u0219i de verificare<\/h3>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-tatsubjekt\">Subiectul activ:<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Subiect al faptei poate fi <strong>orice persoan\u0103 responsabil\u0103 penal<\/strong>, c\u0103reia i-a fost acordat\u0103 <strong>o competen\u021b\u0103 de dispozi\u021bie sau de obligare cu privire la avere<\/strong>. Nu sunt necesare propriet\u0103\u021bi personale speciale, dar este necesar\u0103 o <strong>putere efectiv\u0103 de decizie sau de reprezentare<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-tatobjekt\">Obiectul faptei:<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Obiect al faptei este <strong>averea str\u0103in\u0103 a persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic<\/strong>, care este prejudiciat\u0103 prin <strong>abuzul abuziv de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-tathandlung\">Ac\u021biunea incriminat\u0103:  <\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ac\u021biunea incriminat\u0103 const\u0103 \u00een <strong>abuzul de o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103<\/strong>, prin faptul c\u0103 autorul <strong>\u00eencalc\u0103 \u00een mod inacceptabil reguli de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong> \u0219i, prin aceasta, <strong>provoac\u0103 un prejudiciu patrimonial<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-taterfolg\">Rezultatul faptei:<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rezultatul faptei const\u0103 \u00een <strong>producerea unui prejudiciu patrimonial<\/strong>, care <strong>se datoreaz\u0103 direct abuzului de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-kausalitat\">Cauzalitate:<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prejudiciul patrimonial trebuie s\u0103 fie <strong>o consecin\u021b\u0103 a ac\u021biunilor abuzive<\/strong>. F\u0103r\u0103 <strong>abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>, diminuarea averii <strong>nu s-ar fi produs<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-objektive-zurechnung\">Atribuire obiectiv\u0103:  <\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rezultatul este imputabil obiectiv dac\u0103 <strong>se realizeaz\u0103 exact acel risc<\/strong> pe care norma penal\u0103 ar trebui s\u0103 \u00eel previn\u0103, \u0219i anume c\u0103 <strong>averea str\u0103in\u0103 este prejudiciat\u0103 prin exercitarea abuziv\u0103 a puterii de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie \u00eencredin\u021bate<\/strong>.<\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-peter-harlander\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/ph100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Peter Harlander<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eDecisiv nu este e\u0219ecul economic al unei decizii, ci dac\u0103 s-a realizat tocmai riscul care a fost creat prin exercitarea abuziv\u0103 a competen\u021bei patrimoniale.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-abgrenzung-zu-anderen-delikten\">Delimitarea de alte infrac\u021biuni<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Elementul constitutiv al <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong> cuprinde cazurile \u00een care o persoan\u0103 <strong>abuseaz\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 de o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103 asupra averii altuia sau pentru obligarea legal\u0103 a unei alte persoane<\/strong> \u0219i, prin aceasta, <strong>cauzeaz\u0103 un prejudiciu patrimonial persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic<\/strong>. Punctul central al ilegalit\u0103\u021bii <strong>nu const\u0103 \u00eentr-o inducere \u00een eroare<\/strong>, ci \u00een <strong>gestionarea abuziv\u0103 a puterii de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie \u00eencredin\u021bate<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u00a7 133 StGB \u2013 Delapidare<\/strong>: <strong>Delapidarea<\/strong> cuprinde cazurile \u00een care autorul <strong>\u00ee\u0219i \u00eensu\u0219e\u0219te un activ patrimonial str\u0103in \u00eencredin\u021bat<\/strong>. Punctul central al ilegalit\u0103\u021bii const\u0103 \u00een <strong>\u00eensu\u0219irea averii str\u0103ine<\/strong>, adic\u0103 \u00een faptul c\u0103 autorul trateaz\u0103 activul patrimonial <strong>ca un proprietar \u0219i \u00eel retrage definitiv persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite<\/strong>. \u00cen cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, lipse\u0219te o astfel de \u00eensu\u0219ire. Autorul <strong>prejudiciaz\u0103 persoana \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 din punct de vedere economic<\/strong>, prin faptul c\u0103 <strong>abuseaz\u0103 \u00een mod inacceptabil de o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103<\/strong>. Relevant\u0103 nu este \u00eensu\u0219irea unui activ patrimonial, ci <strong>gestionarea abuziv\u0103 a puterii de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie \u00eencredin\u021bate<\/strong>. Decisiv pentru delimitare este <strong>dac\u0103 dezavantajul patrimonial rezult\u0103 din \u00eensu\u0219irea valorilor \u00eencredin\u021bate<\/strong> sau <strong>din abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103 \u00een cadrul unei puteri de dispozi\u021bie existente<\/strong>. <strong>Dac\u0103 exist\u0103 o inten\u021bie de \u00eensu\u0219ire, abuzul de \u00eencredere este de obicei exclus.<\/strong>     <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>\u00a7 146 StGB \u2013 \u00cen\u0219el\u0103ciune: <\/strong>\u00cen cazul <strong>\u00een\u0219el\u0103ciunii<\/strong>, prejudiciul patrimonial se bazeaz\u0103 pe faptul c\u0103 victima <strong>este determinat\u0103 prin \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune cu privire la fapte<\/strong> s\u0103 efectueze o ac\u021biune, tolerare sau omisiune care prejudiciaz\u0103 averea. Victima ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 <strong>voluntar, dar din cauza unei erori<\/strong>.\u00cen cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, lipse\u0219te o \u00een\u0219elare a persoanei prejudiciate. Prejudiciul rezult\u0103 mai degrab\u0103 din faptul c\u0103 autorul <strong>ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 el \u00eensu\u0219i \u00een cadrul competen\u021belor sale<\/strong>, dar <strong>abuseaz\u0103 de acestea \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil<\/strong>. Decisiv nu este, a\u0219adar, eroarea unei victime, ci <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcarea unei obliga\u021bii de administrare a averii<\/strong>.   <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-konkurrenzen\">Concuren\u021be:<\/h3>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-echte-konkurrenz\">Concuren\u021b\u0103 real\u0103: <\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exist\u0103 concuren\u021b\u0103 real\u0103 dac\u0103, pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 <strong>abuzul de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, sunt realizate \u0219i alte <strong>delicte independente<\/strong>, cum ar fi <strong>falsificarea de documente<\/strong>, <strong>falsificarea de date<\/strong> sau <strong>\u00een\u0219el\u0103ciunea<\/strong>. Delictele r\u0103m\u00e2n coexistente, deoarece sunt afectate <strong>elemente constitutive \u0219i bunuri juridice diferite<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-unechte-konkurrenz\">Concuren\u021b\u0103 fals\u0103:<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exist\u0103 concuren\u021b\u0103 fals\u0103 dac\u0103 un alt element constitutiv cuprinde \u00een \u00eentregime <strong>\u00eentregul con\u021binut ilegal al abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>. \u00cen acest caz, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10002296&amp;Artikel=&amp;Paragraf=153&amp;Anlage=&amp;Uebergangsrecht=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 153 StGB<\/a> se retrage ca <strong>element constitutiv subsidiar<\/strong>, de exemplu, dac\u0103 abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103 este doar <strong>mijloc de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219ire nesubordonat<\/strong> al unui delict mai special. <\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-tatmehrheit\">Pluralitate de fapte: <\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exist\u0103 pluralitate de fapte dac\u0103 sunt comise <strong>mai multe abuzuri de competen\u021b\u0103 independente<\/strong>, care duc fiecare la <strong>prejudicii patrimoniale independente<\/strong>. Fiecare ac\u021biune constituie o fapt\u0103 penal\u0103 proprie. <\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-fortgesetzte-handlung\">Ac\u021biune continuat\u0103: <\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O fapt\u0103 unitar\u0103 poate fi presupus\u0103 dac\u0103 mai multe ac\u021biuni abuzive <strong>sunt \u00eentr-o str\u00e2ns\u0103 leg\u0103tur\u0103 temporal\u0103 \u0219i material\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i sunt sus\u021binute de un <strong>concept unitar de abuz<\/strong>. Fapta se \u00eencheie de \u00eendat\u0103 ce <strong>nu mai au loc alte abuzuri de competen\u021b\u0103 care prejudiciaz\u0103 averea<\/strong>. <\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eAbuzul de \u00eencredere trebuie delimitat clar de \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune \u0219i delapidare: Acuza\u021bia nu se refer\u0103 la \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune sau \u00eensu\u0219ire, ci la abuzul cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 inacceptabil al unei puteri de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie existente.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-beweislast-amp-beweiswurdigung\">Sarcina probei \u0219i aprecierea probelor<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-staatsanwaltschaft\">Parchet: <\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Parchetul trebuie s\u0103 demonstreze c\u0103 acuzatul a s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219it un <strong>abuz de \u00eencredere<\/strong>. Punctul de plecare este dovada c\u0103 acuzatului <strong>i-a fost acordat\u0103 o competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong> de a <strong>dispune de averea altuia sau de a obliga legal o alt\u0103 persoan\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i c\u0103 el <strong>a abuzat cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong> de aceasta. \u00cen plus, trebuie dovedit c\u0103 abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103 a avut loc <strong>\u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>a dus la un prejudiciu patrimonial pentru persoana \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 din punct de vedere economic<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen special, trebuie demonstrat c\u0103<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>acuzatului i-a fost acordat\u0103 o <strong>competen\u021b\u0103 de dispozi\u021bie sau de obligare cu privire la avere<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>aceast\u0103 competen\u021b\u0103 a fost <strong>abuzat\u0103 \u00een mod abuziv \u0219i inacceptabil<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103 a \u00eenc\u0103lcat <strong>reguli de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>prin aceasta, <strong>a survenit un prejudiciu patrimonial<\/strong> persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u00eentre <strong>abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103 \u0219i prejudiciul patrimonial<\/strong> exist\u0103 o leg\u0103tur\u0103 de cauzalitate,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>prejudiciul patrimonial a fost <strong>tocmai o consecin\u021b\u0103 a ac\u021biunilor abuzive<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>acuzatul a ac\u021bionat <strong>cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen plus, parchetul trebuie s\u0103 prezinte dac\u0103 <strong>\u00eentinderea competen\u021bei<\/strong>, <strong>limitele puterii de decizie sau de reprezentare<\/strong>, <strong>regulile de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong>, <strong>inacceptabilitatea procedurii<\/strong>, <strong>prejudiciul patrimonial<\/strong>, <strong>cauzalitatea<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>cuno\u0219tin\u021ba<\/strong> sunt obiectiv constatabile, de exemplu prin<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>m\u0103rturii,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dovezi de comunicare interne sau externe, cum ar fi e-mailuri sau procese-verbale ale discu\u021biilor,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>contracte, procuri, statute sau alte documente organizatorice,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Documente contabile, fluxuri de pl\u0103\u021bi sau mi\u0219c\u0103ri de avere,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>expertize pentru calcularea prejudiciului economic,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>precum \u0219i indicii privind <strong>inacceptabilitatea deciziei<\/strong> sau <strong>procesul decizional abuziv<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gericht\">Instan\u021b\u0103: <\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instan\u021ba examineaz\u0103 toate probele <strong>\u00een contextul general<\/strong>. Aceasta evalueaz\u0103 dac\u0103, dup\u0103 standarde obiective, <strong>a existat o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103<\/strong>, dac\u0103 aceasta <strong>a fost abuzat\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil<\/strong> \u0219i dac\u0103 acest abuz <strong>a dus cauzal la un prejudiciu patrimonial<\/strong>. \u00cen plus, trebuie verificat dac\u0103 <strong>cuno\u0219tin\u021ba abuzului de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong> poate fi stabilit\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 \u00eendoial\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen acest sens, instan\u021ba ia \u00een considerare \u00een special<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Con\u021binutul, \u00eentinderea \u0219i limitele competen\u021bei acordate,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Natura \u0219i gravitatea \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii obliga\u021biilor,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Procesul decizional \u0219i situa\u021bia economic\u0103 ini\u021bial\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>M\u0103rturii privind desf\u0103\u0219urarea intern\u0103 \u0219i rolul acuzatului,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Documente contractuale, structuri organizatorice sau directive interne,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 comportamentul a fost <strong>obiectiv inacceptabil<\/strong> sau se \u00eencadra \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een limitele libert\u0103\u021bii de decizie acceptabile,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 prejudiciul patrimonial a ap\u0103rut <strong>\u00eentr-un mod economic inteligibil<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>precum \u0219i dac\u0103 este vizibil\u0103 o <strong>procedur\u0103 abuziv\u0103 sau sistematic\u0103<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instan\u021ba delimiteaz\u0103 clar de <strong>deciziile antreprenoriale gre\u0219ite<\/strong>, <strong>deciziile de apreciere acceptabile<\/strong>, <strong>simple \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri ale obliga\u021biilor f\u0103r\u0103 producerea unui prejudiciu<\/strong>, precum \u0219i de cazurile \u00een care, de\u0219i a survenit un dezavantaj patrimonial, un <strong>abuz de competen\u021b\u0103 care \u00eendepline\u0219te elementele constitutive<\/strong> nu este \u00eens\u0103 dovedibil.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-beschuldigte-person\">Persoan\u0103 acuzat\u0103: <\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Persoana acuzat\u0103 nu poart\u0103 <strong>nicio sarcin\u0103 a probei<\/strong>. Cu toate acestea, ea poate indica <strong>\u00eendoieli \u00eentemeiate<\/strong>, \u00een special cu privire la <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>dac\u0103 a existat deloc o <strong>competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong> relevant\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 decizia a fost <strong>obiectiv inacceptabil\u0103<\/strong> sau \u00eenc\u0103 acceptabil\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 a ap\u0103rut efectiv un <strong>prejudiciu patrimonial<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 exist\u0103 o <strong>leg\u0103tur\u0103 de cauzalitate<\/strong> \u00eentre ac\u021biune \u0219i prejudiciu,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 acuzatul a ac\u021bionat <strong>cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong> \u00een mod abuziv,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 riscuri economice sau circumstan\u021be externe au cauzat prejudiciul,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dac\u0103 exist\u0103 doar <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri ale obliga\u021biilor de drept civil<\/strong> sau <strong>probleme de r\u0103spundere a organelor<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>precum \u0219i \u00een cazul unor contradic\u021bii sau lacune \u00een acuza\u021bie sau \u00een cazul unor desf\u0103\u0219ur\u0103ri alternative ale evenimentelor.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De asemenea, aceasta poate prezenta faptul c\u0103 deciziile au fost luate <strong>motivat obiectiv<\/strong>, <strong>acceptabil<\/strong>, <strong>justificabil din punct de vedere economic<\/strong> sau <strong>cu bun\u0103-credin\u021b\u0103<\/strong> sau c\u0103, de\u0219i se pretinde un dezavantaj patrimonial, <strong>condi\u021biile abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong> nu sunt \u00eens\u0103 \u00eendeplinite.<\/p>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-typische-bewertung\">Evaluare tipic\u0103<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen practic\u0103, \u00een cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, urm\u0103toarele mijloace de prob\u0103 sunt deosebit de importante:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>M\u0103rturii privind procesul decizional \u0219i competen\u021ba intern\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dovezi de comunicare interne \u0219i externe,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Contracte, procuri, documente ale societ\u0103\u021bii sau regulamente de func\u021bionare,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Documente contabile, fluxuri de pl\u0103\u021bi sau mi\u0219c\u0103ri de avere,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Expertize privind valoarea prejudiciului \u0219i acceptabilitatea deciziei,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Desf\u0103\u0219urarea temporal\u0103 \u00eentre decizie \u0219i producerea prejudiciului,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Indicii privind <strong>o procedur\u0103 abuziv\u0103 sau sistematic inacceptabil\u0103<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>precum \u0219i documente privind <strong>evaluarea economic\u0103 a prejudiciului<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-peter-harlander\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/ph100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Peter Harlander<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201e\u00cen procedurile de abuz de \u00eencredere, nu decide un singur document, ci interac\u021biunea dintre \u00eentinderea competen\u021bei, procesul decizional, evolu\u021bia prejudiciului \u0219i cuno\u0219tin\u021ba ac\u021biunii.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-praxisbeispiele\">Exemple practice<\/h2>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Dispozi\u021bie abuziv\u0103 cu privire la avere \u00een cadrul unei competen\u021be acordate:<\/strong>Un director general dispune de averea societ\u0103\u021bii \u0219i \u00eencheie \u00een mod con\u0219tient un contract care contravine intereselor societ\u0103\u021bii, de exemplu, prin faptul c\u0103 achizi\u021bioneaz\u0103 servicii la pre\u021buri semnificativ mai mari de la o \u00eentreprindere afiliat\u0103. El ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 astfel \u00een cadrul competen\u021bei sale formale de decizie, dar o dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil. Prejudiciul patrimonial rezult\u0103 direct din decizia abuziv\u0103. Astfel, este \u00eendeplinit elementul constitutiv al abuzului de \u00eencredere conform <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10002296&amp;Artikel=&amp;Paragraf=153&amp;Anlage=&amp;Uebergangsrecht=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 153 StGB<\/a>.   <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Abuz inacceptabil de o putere de reprezentare:<\/strong>Un administrator \u00eemputernicit folose\u0219te mijloacele \u00eencredin\u021bate nu \u00een conformitate cu regulile stabilite, ci le folose\u0219te cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u00een scopuri care contravin protec\u021biei averii persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic. De\u0219i este autorizat formal s\u0103 dispun\u0103, el abuseaz\u0103 de aceast\u0103 competen\u021b\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil. Dezavantajul patrimonial rezultat este o consecin\u021b\u0103 direct\u0103 a abuzului de competen\u021b\u0103 \u0219i justific\u0103 abuzul de \u00eencredere conform <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10002296&amp;Artikel=&amp;Paragraf=153&amp;Anlage=&amp;Uebergangsrecht=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 153 StGB<\/a>.  <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aceste exemple clarific\u0103 formele tipice de manifestare ale abuzului de \u00eencredere. Caracteristic este faptul c\u0103 <strong>nu exist\u0103 o \u00een\u0219elare a unei victime<\/strong>, ci c\u0103 autorul <strong>ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 \u00een cadrul unei puteri de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie existente<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>abuseaz\u0103 de aceasta \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil<\/strong>. Punctul central al ilegalit\u0103\u021bii nu const\u0103 \u00een inducerea \u00een eroare, ci \u00een <strong>abuzul cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 inacceptabil de competen\u021be \u00eencredin\u021bate<\/strong>, care duce la un prejudiciu patrimonial pentru persoana \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 din punct de vedere economic.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-subjektiver-tatbestand\">Situa\u021bia de fapt subiectiv\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Elementul constitutiv subiectiv al <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere <\/strong>presupune ca autorul s\u0103 ac\u021bioneze <strong>cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong>. El trebuie s\u0103 \u0219tie c\u0103 <strong>i-a fost acordat\u0103 o competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong> de a <strong>dispune de averea altuia sau de a obliga legal o alt\u0103 persoan\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i c\u0103 el <strong>abuseaz\u0103 de aceasta \u00eentr-un mod inacceptabil<\/strong>. Cuno\u0219tin\u021ba trebuie s\u0103 se refere la <strong>abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>, iar autorul trebuie s\u0103 <strong>recunoasc\u0103<\/strong> c\u0103 ac\u021biunea sa este <strong>prejudiciabil\u0103 pentru avere<\/strong> sau accept\u0103 prejudiciul patrimonial <strong>cel pu\u021bin ca o consecin\u021b\u0103 necesar\u0103<\/strong> a ac\u021biunii sale.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autorul trebuie s\u0103 recunoasc\u0103 faptul c\u0103 comportamentul s\u0103u <strong>\u00eencalc\u0103 reguli de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>este adecvat s\u0103 prejudicieze persoana \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bit\u0103 din punct de vedere economic la avere<\/strong>. Este suficient ca el s\u0103 recunoasc\u0103 <strong>dezavantajul patrimonial ca o consecin\u021b\u0103 sigur\u0103 sau cel pu\u021bin necesar\u0103<\/strong> a ac\u021biunii sale. O simpl\u0103 neglijen\u021b\u0103 sau o simpl\u0103 presupunere nu sunt suficiente.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O <strong>inten\u021bie de \u00eembog\u0103\u021bire<\/strong> <strong>nu este necesar\u0103<\/strong> pentru abuzul de \u00eencredere. Autorul <strong>nu trebuie nici s\u0103 se \u00eembog\u0103\u021beasc\u0103 pe sine, nici s\u0103 urm\u0103reasc\u0103 un avantaj patrimonial<\/strong>. Decisiv este doar faptul c\u0103 el provoac\u0103 <strong>cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 abuzul de competen\u021b\u0103 \u0219i prejudiciul patrimonial cauzat prin aceasta<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nu exist\u0103 un element subiectiv dac\u0103 f\u0103ptuitorul presupune <strong>cu bun\u0103-credin\u021b\u0103<\/strong> c\u0103 ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 <strong>justificabil<\/strong>, <strong>nu recunoa\u0219te<\/strong> producerea unui prejudiciu patrimonial sau dac\u0103 ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 contrar obliga\u021biilor, dar <strong>nu prejudiciaz\u0103 patrimoniul cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong>. \u00cen aceste cazuri, lipse\u0219te inten\u021bia necesar\u0103 pentru <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10002296&amp;Artikel=&amp;Paragraf=153&amp;Anlage=&amp;Uebergangsrecht=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 153 StGB<\/a>. <\/p>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-schuld-amp-irrtumer\">Vinov\u0103\u021bie \u0219i erori<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/drept-penal\/eroare-de-drept\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Eroare de interdic\u021bie<\/a>:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O eroare de interdic\u021bie scuz\u0103 doar dac\u0103 a fost <strong>inevitabil\u0103<\/strong>. Cine stabile\u0219te un comportament care <strong>intervine \u00een mod recognoscibil \u00een drepturile altora<\/strong>, nu se poate prevala de faptul c\u0103 nu a recunoscut ilegalitatea. Fiecare este obligat s\u0103 se informeze cu privire la <strong>limitele legale<\/strong> ale ac\u021biunilor sale. O simpl\u0103 necunoa\u0219tere sau o eroare neglijent\u0103 nu elibereaz\u0103 de responsabilitate.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Principiul vinov\u0103\u021biei:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Este pedepsit doar cine ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 <strong>cu vinov\u0103\u021bie<\/strong>. Infrac\u021biunile inten\u021bionate necesit\u0103 ca autorul s\u0103 recunoasc\u0103 evenimentele esen\u021biale \u0219i s\u0103 le <strong>accepte cel pu\u021bin tacit<\/strong>. Dac\u0103 lipse\u0219te aceast\u0103 inten\u021bie, de exemplu, deoarece autorul presupune \u00een mod eronat c\u0103 comportamentul s\u0103u este permis sau este <strong>sus\u021binut de bun\u0103voie<\/strong>, exist\u0103 cel mult neglijen\u021b\u0103. Aceasta nu este suficient\u0103 \u00een cazul infrac\u021biunilor inten\u021bionate.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Incapacitate de imputare:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nicio vin\u0103 nu revine cuiva care, la momentul faptei, nu a fost \u00een m\u0103sur\u0103 s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 injusti\u021bia ac\u021biunilor sale sau s\u0103 ac\u021bioneze conform acestei \u00een\u021belegeri din cauza unei <strong>tulbur\u0103ri psihice severe<\/strong>, a unei <strong>afect\u0103ri mintale patologice<\/strong> sau a unei <strong>incapacit\u0103\u021bi semnificative de control<\/strong>. \u00cen cazul unor \u00eendoieli corespunz\u0103toare, se ob\u021bine o <strong>expertiz\u0103 psihiatric\u0103<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/drept-penal\/stare-de-necesitate-scuzabila\/\">Stare de necesitate scuzabil\u0103<\/a>:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O stare de necesitate scuzabil\u0103 poate exista dac\u0103 autorul ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 \u00eentr-o <strong>situa\u021bie de constr\u00e2ngere extrem\u0103<\/strong> pentru a \u00eendep\u0103rta un <strong>pericol acut<\/strong> pentru propria via\u021b\u0103 sau pentru via\u021ba altora. Comportamentul r\u0103m\u00e2ne ilegal, dar poate avea un efect <strong>de reducere a vinov\u0103\u021biei<\/strong> sau scuzabil dac\u0103 nu a existat o alt\u0103 cale de ie\u0219ire. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/drept-penal\/asumarea-eronata-a-unei-situatii-de-fapt-justificative\/\">Autoap\u0103rare putativ\u0103<\/a>:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 cineva crede \u00een mod eronat c\u0103 are dreptul la o ac\u021biune de ap\u0103rare, ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 inten\u021bie, dac\u0103 eroarea a fost <strong>serioas\u0103 \u0219i u\u0219or de \u00een\u021beles<\/strong>. O astfel de eroare poate <strong>reduce sau exclude vinov\u0103\u021bia<\/strong>. Cu toate acestea, dac\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2ne o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biei de diligen\u021b\u0103, se poate lua \u00een considerare o evaluare neglijent\u0103 sau atenuant\u0103, dar nu o justificare.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-strafaufhebung-amp-diversion\">Anularea pedepsei \u0219i abaterea<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-diversion\">Diversiunea:<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O <strong>diversiune este \u00een principiu posibil\u0103 \u00een cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, deoarece este o infrac\u021biune patrimonial\u0103 <strong>f\u0103r\u0103 violen\u021b\u0103 sau amenin\u021bare periculoas\u0103<\/strong>. Dac\u0103 o solu\u021bionare diversionar\u0103 este luat\u0103 \u00een considerare depinde \u00een mod semnificativ de <strong>amploarea vinov\u0103\u021biei, valoarea daunei, tipul abuzului de autoritate \u0219i comportamentul infractorului<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen special \u00een cazul <strong>actelor de abuz de \u00eencredere simple<\/strong> cu <strong>prejudicii patrimoniale minore<\/strong>, <strong>lipsa antecedentelor penale<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>repararea complet\u0103 a prejudiciului<\/strong>, o diversiune poate fi adecvat\u0103. Odat\u0103 cu cre\u0219terea <strong>valorii daunei<\/strong>, <strong>caracterul nejustificat al ac\u021biunilor<\/strong> sau <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcarea multipl\u0103 a obliga\u021biilor<\/strong>, probabilitatea unei solu\u021bion\u0103ri diversionare scade semnificativ. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O deviere poate fi examinat\u0103 dac\u0103<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>vinov\u0103\u021bia este \u00een general redus\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>nu exist\u0103 o valoare considerabil\u0103 a prejudiciului,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>prejudiciul material a fost sc\u0103zut \u0219i compensat integral,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>nu exist\u0103 un abuz de autoritate planificat sau continuu,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>situa\u021bia de fapt este clar\u0103 \u0219i u\u0219or de \u00een\u021beles,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>iar f\u0103ptuitorul este \u00een\u021beleg\u0103tor, cooperant \u0219i dispus s\u0103 ajung\u0103 la o \u00een\u021belegere.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 o diversiune este luat\u0103 \u00een considerare, instan\u021ba poate dispune <strong>prest\u0103ri de bani<\/strong>, <strong>prest\u0103ri de servicii \u00een folosul comunit\u0103\u021bii<\/strong>, <strong>instruc\u021biuni de supraveghere<\/strong> sau o <strong>\u00eemp\u0103care<\/strong>. O diversiune <strong>nu duce la o condamnare<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>nu duce la o \u00eenregistrare \u00een cazierul judiciar<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ausschluss-der-diversion\">Excluderea diversific\u0103rii:<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O diversiune este exclus\u0103 dac\u0103<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>abuzul de \u00eencredere a fost comis <strong>planificat, sistematic sau continuu<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>a ap\u0103rut un <strong>prejudiciu patrimonial considerabil<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>exist\u0103 <strong>mai multe abuzuri de autoritate independente<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>abuzul de autoritate a avut loc <strong>\u00eentr-un mod deosebit de nejustificat<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>se adaug\u0103 circumstan\u021be agravante speciale,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>sau comportamentul general reprezint\u0103 o <strong>afectare considerabil\u0103 a averii str\u0103ine<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Numai \u00een cazul unei <strong>vinov\u0103\u021bii reduse<\/strong>, a unui <strong>prejudiciu u\u0219or de gestionat<\/strong> \u0219i a unei <strong>repar\u0103ri complete timpurii<\/strong>, o solu\u021bionare diversionar\u0103 este realist\u0103. \u00cen practic\u0103, diversiunea este posibil\u0103 \u00een cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, dar <strong>nu este un automatism<\/strong>, ci \u00eentotdeauna o <strong>decizie individual\u0103<\/strong>. <\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eDiversiunea nu este un automatism. O ac\u021biune planificat\u0103, repetarea sau un prejudiciu patrimonial sensibil exclud adesea o solu\u021bionare diversionale \u00een practic\u0103. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-strafzumessung-amp-folgen\">Stabilirea pedepsei \u0219i consecin\u021be<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instan\u021ba stabile\u0219te pedeapsa \u00een func\u021bie de <strong>amploarea prejudiciului patrimonial<\/strong>, de <strong>tipul, intensitatea \u0219i durata abuzului de autoritate<\/strong>, precum \u0219i de <strong>c\u00e2t de mult a fost afectat\u0103 averea persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic<\/strong>. Este esen\u021bial \u00een special <strong>c\u00e2t de nejustificat<\/strong>, <strong>orientat spre scop<\/strong> sau <strong>repetat<\/strong> a abuzat f\u0103ptuitorul de autoritatea acordat\u0103 \u0219i dac\u0103 comportamentul contrar obliga\u021biilor a dus la o <strong>afectare sensibil\u0103 a averii<\/strong>. Trebuie luat \u00een considerare \u0219i dac\u0103 f\u0103ptuitorul a ac\u021bionat <strong>profit\u00e2nd de o rela\u021bie special\u0103 de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, <strong>\u00een cadrul unei pozi\u021bii proeminente<\/strong> sau <strong>ignor\u00e2nd cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 regulile de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-erschwerungsgrunde-bestehen-insbesondere-wenn\">Motivele agravante exist\u0103 \u00een special dac\u0103<\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>fapta a fost comis\u0103 <strong>planificat, sistematic sau repetat<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>a rezultat <strong>un prejudiciu patrimonial considerabil<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>au fost afecta\u021bi <strong>mai mul\u021bi active<\/strong> sau pozi\u021bii economice centrale,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>f\u0103ptuitorul a profitat de <strong>o rela\u021bie special\u0103 de \u00eencredere<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>fapta a fost comis\u0103 \u00eentr-o <strong>rela\u021bie de apropiere, dependen\u021b\u0103 sau superioritate<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>sau exist\u0103 <strong>condamn\u0103ri penale relevante<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-milderungsgrunde-sind-etwa\">Motivele atenuante sunt, de exemplu<\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Integritatea<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>o <strong>m\u0103rturisire complet\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i o \u00een\u021belegere vizibil\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>o <strong>\u00eencetare timpurie<\/strong> a comportamentului contrar obliga\u021biilor,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>eforturi active \u0219i complete de repara\u021bie<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>situa\u021bii speciale de <strong>\u00eenc\u0103rcare sau suprasolicitare<\/strong> la infractor,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O <strong>suspendare condi\u021bionat\u0103 a pedepsei cu \u00eenchisoarea<\/strong> este \u00een principiu luat\u0103 \u00een considerare \u00een cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, dar trebuie <strong>evaluat\u0103 restrictiv<\/strong>, deoarece fapta presupune un <strong>abuz de autoritate comis cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong>. Decisiv este dac\u0103, \u00een ciuda \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii obliga\u021biilor, exist\u0103 un <strong>prognostic social pozitiv<\/strong> \u0219i cazul concret se situeaz\u0103 <strong>\u00een zona inferioar\u0103 a con\u021binutului de vinov\u0103\u021bie \u0219i ilegalitate<\/strong>, de exemplu, \u00een cazul unui prejudiciu minor \u0219i al unei repara\u021bii complete timpurii a prejudiciului. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-strafrahmen\">Limitele pedepsei<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Abuzul de \u00eencredere<\/strong> se pedepse\u0219te cu <strong>\u00eenchisoare de p\u00e2n\u0103 la \u0219ase luni sau cu amend\u0103 de p\u00e2n\u0103 la 360 de zile-amend\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 prejudiciul patrimonial cauzat dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te <strong>5.000 EUR<\/strong>, intervalul de pedeaps\u0103 cre\u0219te la <strong>\u00eenchisoare de p\u00e2n\u0103 la trei ani<\/strong>. \u00cen cazul unui prejudiciu de <strong>mai mult de 300.000 EUR<\/strong>, intervalul de pedeaps\u0103 este <strong>\u00eenchisoare de la unu la zece ani<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-geldstrafe-tagessatzsystem\">Amenda \u2013 sistemul de cote zilnice<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dreptul penal austriac calculeaz\u0103 amenzile \u00een func\u021bie de <strong>sistemul de cote zilnice<\/strong>. <strong>Num\u0103rul de cote zilnice<\/strong> depinde de <strong>vinov\u0103\u021bie<\/strong>, <strong>suma pe zi<\/strong> depinde de <strong>capacitatea financiar\u0103<\/strong>. \u00cen acest fel, pedeapsa este adaptat\u0103 la circumstan\u021bele personale \u0219i r\u0103m\u00e2ne totu\u0219i vizibil\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Interval:<\/strong> p\u00e2n\u0103 la <strong>720 de cote zilnice<\/strong> \u2013 minimum <strong>4 \u20ac<\/strong>, maximum <strong>5.000 \u20ac<\/strong> pe zi.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Formul\u0103 practic\u0103:<\/strong> Aproximativ <strong>6 luni de \u00eenchisoare corespund la aproximativ 360 de cote zilnice<\/strong>. Aceast\u0103 conversie serve\u0219te doar ca <strong>orientare<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>nu este o schem\u0103 rigid\u0103<\/strong>. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>\u00cen caz de neplat\u0103:<\/strong> Instan\u021ba poate impune o <strong>pedeaps\u0103 cu \u00eenchisoarea de substitu\u021bie<\/strong>. De regul\u0103, se aplic\u0103 urm\u0103toarele: <strong>1 zi de pedeaps\u0103 cu \u00eenchisoarea de substitu\u021bie corespunde la 2 cote zilnice<\/strong>. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-hinweis\">Not\u0103:<\/h4>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, <strong>amenda este prev\u0103zut\u0103 expres de lege<\/strong> \u0219i este adesea impus\u0103 ca <strong>pedeaps\u0103 principal\u0103<\/strong>, \u00een special \u00een cazul <strong>prejudiciilor minore \u0219i a vinov\u0103\u021biei reduse<\/strong>, \u00een timp ce, odat\u0103 cu cre\u0219terea valorii daunei, <strong>pedeapsa cu \u00eenchisoarea<\/strong> trece \u00een prim-plan.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-freiheitsstrafe-amp-teil-bedingte-nachsicht\">Pedeapsa cu \u00eenchisoarea \u0219i clemen\u021b\u0103 (par\u021bial) condi\u021bionat\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00a7 37 StGB: Dac\u0103 sanc\u021biunea legal\u0103 prevede o pedeaps\u0103 de p\u00e2n\u0103 la cinci ani, instan\u021ba poate impune, \u00een condi\u021biile legale, \u00een locul unei pedepse scurte cu \u00eenchisoarea de maximum un an, o amend\u0103. Aceast\u0103 prevedere este \u00een principiu aplicabil\u0103 \u00een cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong>, deoarece intervalul de pedeaps\u0103 conform alineatului 1 este de p\u00e2n\u0103 la \u0219ase luni, iar \u00een cazul prejudiciilor calificate conform alineatului 3 este de p\u00e2n\u0103 la trei ani. \u00cen practic\u0103, \u00a7 37 StGB este relevant mai ales atunci c\u00e2nd o <strong>pedeaps\u0103 scurt\u0103 cu \u00eenchisoarea<\/strong> ar fi adecvat\u0103 vinov\u0103\u021biei, dar imaginea faptei este, \u00een general, <strong>mai pu\u021bin grav\u0103<\/strong>. Nu este vorba despre o <strong>amenin\u021bare independent\u0103 cu amend\u0103<\/strong>, ci despre o <strong>form\u0103 de \u00eenlocuire pentru pedepsele scurte cu \u00eenchisoarea<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00a7 43 StGB: O <strong>suspendare condi\u021bionat\u0103 a pedepsei cu \u00eenchisoarea<\/strong> este posibil\u0103 dac\u0103 pedeapsa impus\u0103 <strong>nu dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te doi ani<\/strong> \u0219i exist\u0103 un <strong>prognostic social pozitiv<\/strong>. \u00cen cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere, aceast\u0103 posibilitate este relevant\u0103 \u00een practic\u0103, \u00een special \u00een cazul <strong>prejudiciilor minore sau compensate<\/strong>, al <strong>abuzului unic de autoritate<\/strong> \u0219i al <strong>lipsei antecedentelor penale relevante<\/strong>. Decisiv este dac\u0103, \u00een ciuda <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 a obliga\u021biilor<\/strong>, se poate presupune c\u0103 f\u0103ptuitorul nu va comite <strong>alte infrac\u021biuni patrimoniale<\/strong> \u00een viitor.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00a7 43a StGB: <strong>Suspendarea par\u021bial condi\u021bionat\u0103<\/strong> permite o combina\u021bie \u00eentre <strong>partea necondi\u021bionat\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>partea suspendat\u0103 condi\u021bionat<\/strong> a pedepsei \u00een cazul pedepselor cu \u00eenchisoarea de peste \u0219ase luni \u0219i p\u00e2n\u0103 la doi ani. \u00cen cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere, aceast\u0103 form\u0103 poate deveni important\u0103 dac\u0103 imaginea faptei <strong>dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te un caz banal<\/strong>, de exemplu, \u00een cazul <strong>prejudiciilor mai mari<\/strong> sau al <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii multiple a obliga\u021biilor<\/strong>, dar <strong>nu exist\u0103 circumstan\u021be agravante deosebite<\/strong> \u0219i exist\u0103 \u00een continuare un <strong>prognostic social favorabil<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/drept-penal\/asistenta-de-probatiune-si-instructiuni\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7\u00a7 50 p\u00e2n\u0103 la 52 StGB:<\/a> Instan\u021ba poate da <strong>indica\u021bii<\/strong> \u0219i poate dispune <strong>asisten\u021b\u0103 de proba\u021biune<\/strong>. Acestea se refer\u0103, \u00een cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere, adesea la m\u0103suri de <strong>reparare a prejudiciului<\/strong>, de <strong>ordine financiar\u0103<\/strong> sau de <strong>stabilizare a situa\u021biei economice \u0219i profesionale<\/strong>. Scopul este de a preveni <strong>alte abuzuri de autoritate<\/strong> \u0219i de a ob\u021bine o <strong>schimbare durabil\u0103 a comportamentului \u00een conformitate cu legea<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-zustandigkeit-der-gerichte\">Competen\u021ba instan\u021belor<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-sachliche-zustandigkeit\">Competen\u021ba material\u0103<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere simplu<\/strong> cu o amenin\u021bare cu pedeapsa de <strong>p\u00e2n\u0103 la \u0219ase luni de \u00eenchisoare sau amend\u0103<\/strong>, procedura este condus\u0103 <strong>\u00een fa\u021ba Judec\u0103toriei<\/strong>. Decizia este luat\u0103 de un <strong>judec\u0103tor unic<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 prejudiciul patrimonial cauzat atinge <strong>mai mult de 5.000 EUR<\/strong>, intervalul de pedeaps\u0103 cre\u0219te la <strong>p\u00e2n\u0103 la trei ani de \u00eenchisoare<\/strong>. \u00cen aceste cazuri, <strong>Tribunalul Regional este competent ca judec\u0103tor unic<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 exist\u0103 un prejudiciu patrimonial deosebit de mare de <strong>mai mult de 300.000 EUR<\/strong>, intervalul de pedeaps\u0103 este <strong>de la unu la zece ani de \u00eenchisoare<\/strong>. Atunci decide <strong>Tribunalul Regional ca tribunal cu jura\u021bi<\/strong>, adic\u0103 cu judec\u0103tor profesionist \u0219i jura\u021bi. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O procedur\u0103 \u00een fa\u021ba unui <strong>tribunal cu jura\u021bi<\/strong> <strong>nu<\/strong> este luat\u0103 \u00een considerare \u00een cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ortliche-zustandigkeit\">Competen\u021ba teritorial\u0103<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen principiu, este competent acel tribunal <strong>\u00een a c\u0103rui circumscrip\u021bie a fost s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219it\u0103 fapta contrar\u0103 obliga\u021biilor<\/strong>, adic\u0103 acolo unde <strong>puterea de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie a fost abuzat\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dac\u0103 acest loc nu poate fi stabilit \u00een mod clar, de regul\u0103, este competent tribunalul de la<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>domiciliul sau re\u0219edin\u021ba<\/strong> persoanei acuzate sau<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>sediul Parchetului competent<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-instanzenzug\">Calea de atac<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sentin\u021bele <strong>Judec\u0103toriei<\/strong> pot fi atacate cu <strong>apel<\/strong>. Despre aceasta decide <strong>Tribunalul Regional<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sentin\u021bele <strong>Tribunalului Regional<\/strong> sunt supuse, \u00een func\u021bie de caz, <strong>apelului \u0219i, eventual, altor c\u0103i de atac<\/strong>, despre care decide <strong>Curtea Superioar\u0103 de Justi\u021bie<\/strong> sau <strong>Curtea Suprem\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen acest caz, se verific\u0103 dac\u0103 procedura a fost <strong>condus\u0103 \u00een mod corespunz\u0103tor<\/strong>, dac\u0103 dreptul a fost <strong>aplicat corect<\/strong> \u0219i dac\u0103 decizia a fost luat\u0103 <strong>sustenabil\u0103 din punct de vedere juridic<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-zivilanspruche-im-strafverfahren\">Preten\u021bii civile \u00een cadrul procesului penal<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen cazul <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere conform <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ris.bka.gv.at\/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&amp;Gesetzesnummer=10002296&amp;Artikel=&amp;Paragraf=153&amp;Anlage=&amp;Uebergangsrecht=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a7 153 StGB<\/a><\/strong>, persoana prejudiciat\u0103 din punct de vedere economic poate face valabile preten\u021biile sale de drept civil ca <strong>parte v\u0103t\u0103mat\u0103<\/strong> <strong>direct \u00een procedura penal\u0103<\/strong>. Deoarece abuzul de \u00eencredere se bazeaz\u0103 pe un <strong>abuz cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 contrar obliga\u021biilor al unei puteri de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie acordate<\/strong>, preten\u021biile se refer\u0103 \u00een special la <strong>dezavantaje patrimoniale<\/strong> care rezult\u0103 <strong>direct din acest abuz de autoritate<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pot fi invocate, \u00een special, <strong>sume de bani<\/strong>, <strong>pl\u0103\u021bi direc\u021bionate gre\u0219it<\/strong>, <strong>transferuri de active<\/strong>, <strong>obliga\u021bii inadmisibile<\/strong> sau alte <strong>dezavantaje financiare<\/strong> care au rezultat din exercitarea contrar\u0103 obliga\u021biilor a autorit\u0103\u021bii. Decisiv este faptul c\u0103 prejudiciul este <strong>o consecin\u021b\u0103 direct\u0103 a abuzului<\/strong> de responsabilitate patrimonial\u0103 acordat\u0103. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen func\u021bie de situa\u021bia de fapt, pot fi solicitate \u0219i <strong>prejudicii consecutive<\/strong>, de exemplu, dac\u0103 abuzul de autoritate a atras dup\u0103 sine <strong>dezavantaje economice<\/strong>, <strong>deficit de lichidit\u0103\u021bi<\/strong> sau <strong>prejudicii opera\u021bionale<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Al\u0103turarea p\u0103r\u021bii v\u0103t\u0103mate suspend\u0103 prescrip\u021bia<\/strong> preten\u021biilor invocate pe durata procedurii penale. Abia odat\u0103 cu <strong>\u00eencheierea definitiv\u0103<\/strong> a acesteia, termenul de prescrip\u021bie \u00eencepe s\u0103 curg\u0103 din nou, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care prejudiciul nu a fost deja acordat. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O <strong>reparare voluntar\u0103<\/strong>, cum ar fi <strong>restituirea sumelor deturnate<\/strong>, <strong>compensarea prejudiciului cauzat<\/strong> sau un <strong>efort serios de desp\u0103gubire<\/strong>, poate avea un efect <strong>atenuant<\/strong>, cu condi\u021bia s\u0103 aib\u0103 loc <strong>\u00een timp util \u0219i complet<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cu toate acestea, dac\u0103 abuzul de \u00eencredere a fost comis <strong>planificat<\/strong>, <strong>repetat<\/strong> sau <strong>sub un abuz deosebit de grav al unei rela\u021bii de \u00eencredere<\/strong> sau a fost cauzat un <strong>prejudiciu patrimonial considerabil<\/strong>, o reparare ulterioar\u0103 a prejudiciului pierde, de regul\u0103, o parte din <strong>efectul s\u0103u atenuant<\/strong>. \u00cen astfel de cazuri, o compensare ulterioar\u0103 poate <strong>compensa doar \u00een mod limitat<\/strong> nedreptatea faptei. <\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201ePreten\u021biile p\u0103r\u021bilor civile trebuie s\u0103 fie clar cuantificate \u0219i dovedite. F\u0103r\u0103 o documenta\u021bie curat\u0103 a prejudiciului, preten\u021bia de desp\u0103gubire \u00een cadrul procedurii penale r\u0103m\u00e2ne adesea incomplet\u0103 \u0219i se mut\u0103 \u00een procedura civil\u0103. \u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-strafverfahren-im-uberblick\">Procesul penal pe scurt<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ermittlungsbeginn\">\u00cenceputul anchetei<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 presupune o suspiciune concret\u0103, de la care o persoan\u0103 este considerat\u0103 suspect \u0219i poate invoca toate drepturile suspectului. Deoarece este vorba de o <strong>infrac\u021biune urm\u0103rit\u0103 din oficiu<\/strong>, poli\u021bia \u0219i parchetul ini\u021biaz\u0103 procedura <strong>din oficiu<\/strong>, de \u00eendat\u0103 ce exist\u0103 o suspiciune corespunz\u0103toare. O declara\u021bie special\u0103 a persoanei prejudiciate nu este necesar\u0103 \u00een acest scop.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-polizei-und-staatsanwaltschaft\">Poli\u021bia \u0219i Parchetul<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Parchetul conduce ancheta \u0219i stabile\u0219te cursul ulterior. Poli\u021bia criminal\u0103 efectueaz\u0103 investiga\u021biile necesare, asigur\u0103 urmele, preia declara\u021bii ale martorilor \u0219i documenteaz\u0103 prejudiciul. \u00cen cele din urm\u0103, parchetul decide asupra <strong>\u00eencet\u0103rii<\/strong>, <strong>diversiunii<\/strong> sau <strong>acuz\u0103rii<\/strong>, \u00een func\u021bie de gradul de culp\u0103, valoarea prejudiciului \u0219i situa\u021bia probelor.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-beschuldigtenvernehmung\">Audierea inculpatului<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cenainte de fiecare audiere, persoana acuzat\u0103 prime\u0219te o informare complet\u0103 cu privire la drepturile sale, \u00een special <strong>dreptul la t\u0103cere<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>dreptul de a fi asistat de un avocat<\/strong>. Dac\u0103 acuzatul solicit\u0103 un avocat, audierea trebuie am\u00e2nat\u0103. Audierea formal\u0103 a acuzatului serve\u0219te la confruntarea cu acuza\u021bia, precum \u0219i la acordarea posibilit\u0103\u021bii de a lua pozi\u021bie.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-akteneinsicht\">Inspectarea dosarului<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Consultarea dosarului poate fi f\u0103cut\u0103 la poli\u021bie, parchet sau instan\u021b\u0103. Aceasta include \u0219i probe, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care scopul anchetei nu este pus \u00een pericol. Conectarea p\u0103r\u021bii civile se bazeaz\u0103 pe regulile generale ale Codului de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 \u0219i permite persoanei v\u0103t\u0103mate s\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i valorifice preten\u021biile de desp\u0103gubire direct \u00een cadrul procedurii penale.  <\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-hauptverhandlung\">Procesul principal<\/h3>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0218edin\u021ba principal\u0103 serve\u0219te la administrarea oral\u0103 a probelor, la evaluarea juridic\u0103 \u0219i la decizia cu privire la eventualele preten\u021bii de drept civil. Instan\u021ba verific\u0103 \u00een special desf\u0103\u0219urarea faptei, inten\u021bia, valoarea prejudiciului \u0219i credibilitatea declara\u021biilor. Procedura se \u00eencheie cu condamnare, achitare sau solu\u021bionare diversionar\u0103.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-beschuldigtenrechte\">Drepturile inculpatului<\/h2>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Informare &amp; Ap\u0103rare:<\/strong> Dreptul la notificare, asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103, alegerea liber\u0103 a avocatului ap\u0103r\u0103tor, asisten\u021b\u0103 de traducere, cereri de probe.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>T\u0103cere &amp; Avocat:<\/strong> Dreptul la t\u0103cere \u00een orice moment; \u00een cazul implic\u0103rii unui avocat ap\u0103r\u0103tor, audierea trebuie am\u00e2nat\u0103.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Obliga\u021bia de informare:<\/strong> informare \u00een timp util cu privire la suspiciune\/drepturi; excep\u021bii numai pentru a asigura scopul anchetei.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Consultarea practic\u0103 a dosarului:<\/strong> Dosarele de anchet\u0103 \u0219i de procedur\u0103 principal\u0103; consultarea de c\u0103tre ter\u021bi este limitat\u0103 \u00een favoarea suspectului.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201ePa\u0219ii corec\u021bi \u00een primele 48 de ore decid adesea dac\u0103 o procedur\u0103 escaladeaz\u0103 sau r\u0103m\u00e2ne controlabil\u0103.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-praxis-amp-verhaltenstipps\">Practic\u0103 \u0219i sfaturi de comportament<\/h2>\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>P\u0103stra\u021bi t\u0103cerea.<\/strong> O scurt\u0103 explica\u021bie este suficient\u0103: \u201e\u00cemi exercit dreptul de a p\u0103stra t\u0103cerea \u0219i voi vorbi mai \u00eent\u00e2i cu ap\u0103rarea mea.\u201d Acest drept se aplic\u0103 deja de la prima audiere de c\u0103tre poli\u021bie sau parchet. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Contacta\u021bi imediat ap\u0103rarea.<\/strong>F\u0103r\u0103 a avea acces la dosarele de anchet\u0103, nu ar trebui f\u0103cut\u0103 nicio declara\u021bie. Abia dup\u0103 consultarea dosarului, ap\u0103rarea poate evalua ce strategie \u0219i ce asigurare a probelor sunt utile. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Asigura\u021bi imediat probele.<\/strong>Toate documentele, mesajele, fotografiile, videoclipurile \u0219i alte \u00eenregistr\u0103ri disponibile ar trebui s\u0103 le asigura\u021bi c\u00e2t mai cur\u00e2nd posibil \u0219i s\u0103 le p\u0103stra\u021bi \u00een copie. Datele digitale trebuie asigurate \u00een mod regulat \u0219i protejate \u00eempotriva modific\u0103rilor ulterioare. Nota\u021bi persoanele importante ca posibili martori \u0219i consemna\u021bi desf\u0103\u0219urarea evenimentelor \u00eentr-un protocol de memorie \u00een timp util.  <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Nu lua\u021bi leg\u0103tura cu partea advers\u0103.<\/strong> Propriile mesaje, apeluri sau post\u0103ri pot fi folosite ca probe \u00eempotriva dumneavoastr\u0103. Toat\u0103 comunicarea ar trebui s\u0103 aib\u0103 loc exclusiv prin intermediul ap\u0103r\u0103rii. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Asigura\u021bi \u00eenregistr\u0103rile video \u0219i de date \u00een timp util.<\/strong>\u00cenregistr\u0103rile video de supraveghere din mijloacele de transport \u00een comun, localuri sau de la administra\u021biile imobiliare sunt adesea \u0219terse automat dup\u0103 c\u00e2teva zile. Cererile de asigurare a datelor trebuie, prin urmare, depuse imediat la operatori, poli\u021bie sau parchet. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Documenta\u021bi perchezi\u021biile \u0219i confisc\u0103rile.<\/strong> \u00cen cazul perchezi\u021biilor la domiciliu sau al confisc\u0103rilor, ar trebui s\u0103 solicita\u021bi o copie a ordinului sau a procesului-verbal. Nota\u021bi data, ora, persoanele implicate \u0219i toate obiectele luate. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>\u00cen caz de arestare: nicio declara\u021bie cu privire la fapt\u0103.<\/strong>Insista\u021bi asupra inform\u0103rii imediate a ap\u0103r\u0103rii dumneavoastr\u0103. Arestarea preventiv\u0103 poate fi dispus\u0103 numai \u00een caz de suspiciune \u00eentemeiat\u0103 \u0219i motiv suplimentar de arestare. M\u0103surile mai bl\u00e2nde (de exemplu, angajament, obliga\u021bia de a se prezenta, interdic\u021bia de contact) sunt prioritare.  <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Preg\u0103ti\u021bi \u00een mod \u021bintit repara\u021bia.<\/strong>Pl\u0103\u021bile, presta\u021biile simbolice, scuzele sau alte oferte de compensare ar trebui s\u0103 fie gestionate \u0219i dovedite exclusiv prin intermediul ap\u0103r\u0103rii. O repara\u021bie structurat\u0103 poate avea un efect pozitiv asupra devierii \u0219i stabilirii pedepsei. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-peter-harlander\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/ph100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Peter Harlander\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Peter Harlander<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eCine ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 cu chibzuin\u021b\u0103, asigur\u0103 probe \u0219i caut\u0103 sprijin juridic din timp, p\u0103streaz\u0103 controlul asupra procedurii.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-ihre-vorteile-mit-anwaltlicher-unterstutzung\">Avantajele dumneavoastr\u0103 cu asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Evaluarea juridic\u0103 a <strong>abuzului de \u00eencredere<\/strong> depinde \u00een mod semnificativ de <strong>amploarea concret\u0103 a autorit\u0103\u021bii acordate<\/strong>, de <strong>abuzul nejustificat al acesteia<\/strong>, de <strong>prejudiciul patrimonial produs<\/strong>, precum \u0219i de <strong>inten\u021bia ac\u021biunilor<\/strong>. Chiar \u0219i <strong>abateri minore \u00een situa\u021bia de fapt<\/strong> pot decide dac\u0103 exist\u0103 \u00eentr-adev\u0103r un abuz de \u00eencredere penal, dac\u0103 exist\u0103 doar o <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biilor de drept civil<\/strong> sau, \u00een lipsa inten\u021biei, a caracterului nejustificat sau a prejudiciului patrimonial, <strong>nu exist\u0103 deloc o r\u0103spundere penal\u0103<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">O <strong>asisten\u021b\u0103 juridic\u0103 timpurie<\/strong> asigur\u0103 c\u0103 situa\u021bia de fapt este <strong>\u00eencadrat\u0103 cu precizie<\/strong>, probele sunt <strong>evaluate critic<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>circumstan\u021bele exoneratoare<\/strong> sunt prelucrate \u00een mod legal, \u00eenainte ca ipotezele incriminatoare s\u0103 se consolideze \u00een procedur\u0103.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Firma noastr\u0103 de avocatur\u0103<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>verific\u0103 <strong>ce autorit\u0103\u021bi au fost acordate efectiv<\/strong> \u0219i dac\u0103 acestea au fost dep\u0103\u0219ite \u00een general \u00een cazul concret,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>analizeaz\u0103 dac\u0103 exist\u0103 o <strong>\u00eenc\u0103lcare nejustificat\u0103 a regulilor de protec\u021bie a averii<\/strong> sau doar o <strong>decizie antreprenorial\u0103 gre\u0219it\u0103<\/strong>, exercitarea discre\u021biei sau o chestiune organizatoric\u0103,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>evalueaz\u0103 <strong>situa\u021bia probatorie privind prejudiciul patrimonial<\/strong>, cauzalitatea \u0219i inten\u021bia ac\u021biunilor,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>clarific\u0103 dac\u0103 prejudiciul pretins a <strong>avut loc efectiv<\/strong>, este verificabil din punct de vedere contabil \u0219i imputabil din punct de vedere juridic,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>dezvolt\u0103 o <strong>strategie de ap\u0103rare clar\u0103<\/strong>, care prezint\u0103 contextul economic, procesele de decizie \u0219i desf\u0103\u0219urarea efectiv\u0103 <strong>\u00een mod precis \u0219i inteligibil din punct de vedere juridic<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen calitate de <strong>reprezentare specializat\u0103 \u00een drept penal<\/strong>, ne asigur\u0103m c\u0103 o <strong>acuza\u021bie de abuz de \u00eencredere este verificat\u0103 cu aten\u021bie<\/strong> \u0219i c\u0103 procedura este condus\u0103 pe o <strong>baz\u0103 factual\u0103 \u0219i juridic\u0103 solid\u0103<\/strong>, cu scopul de a <strong>limita sau de a evita complet riscurile de drept penal \u00een stadiu incipient<\/strong>.<\/p>\n    <div class=\"mr-quote mrbg clearfix\">\n        <a class=\"mr-quote-person\" href=\"\/ueber-uns\/rechtsanwalt-sebastian-riedlmair\/\" title=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"mr-quote-person-img\" src=\"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/themes\/harlander\/design\/sr100.webp\" width=\"100\"\n                 height=\"100\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Riedlmair\">\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-text\">\n            Sebastian Riedlmair<br>\n            <span class=\"mr-quote-person-function\">Harlander &amp; Partner Rechtsanw\u00e4lte<\/span>\n        <\/span>\n        <\/a>\n        <span class=\"mr-quote-content\">\u201eSprijinul juridic \u00eenseamn\u0103 separarea clar\u0103 a evenimentelor reale de evalu\u0103ri \u0219i dezvoltarea unei strategii de ap\u0103rare fiabile din acestea.\u201c<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n<a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-faq-haufig-gestellte-fragen\">\u00centreb\u0103ri frecvente<\/h2>\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq uagb-faq__outer-wrap uagb-block-FAQ-Untreue uagb-faq-icon-row uagb-faq-layout-accordion uagb-faq-expand-first-true uagb-faq-inactive-other-true uagb-faq__wrap uagb-buttons-layout-wrap uagb-faq-equal-height     \" data-faqtoggle=\"true\" role=\"tablist\"><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/harlander-partner.eu\\\/ro\\\/drept-penal\\\/abuz-de-incredere\\\/\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"C\\u00e2nd exist\\u0103 abuz de \\u00eencredere conform \\u00a7 153 StGB?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Exist\\u0103 abuz de \\u00eencredere atunci c\\u00e2nd cineva abuzeaz\\u0103 cu bun\\u0103 \\u0219tiin\\u021b\\u0103 de o autoritate acordat\\u0103 asupra averii str\\u0103ine sau pentru obliga\\u021bia juridic\\u0103 a altuia \\u0219i cauzeaz\\u0103 astfel un prejudiciu patrimonial. Decisiv este faptul c\\u0103 exist\\u0103 o obliga\\u021bie special\\u0103 de \\u00eengrijire a averii \\u0219i c\\u0103 autoritatea este exercitat\\u0103 \\u00eentr-un mod nejustificat. Nu orice \\u00eenc\\u0103lcare a obliga\\u021biilor este suficient\\u0103, ci doar un abuz de autoritate grav. \\u00cen plus, prejudiciul trebuie s\\u0103 fie o consecin\\u021b\\u0103 direct\\u0103 a acestui abuz.   \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Care este diferen\\u021ba dintre abuzul de \\u00eencredere \\u0219i fraud\\u0103?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"\\u00cen cazul fraudei, prejudiciul este cauzat de \\u00een\\u0219el\\u0103ciune \\u0219i de o eroare a victimei, deoarece victima efectueaz\\u0103 o dispozi\\u021bie patrimonial\\u0103 din cauza erorii. \\u00cen cazul abuzului de \\u00eencredere, aceast\\u0103 \\u00een\\u0219el\\u0103ciune lipse\\u0219te, deoarece f\\u0103ptuitorul ac\\u021bioneaz\\u0103 \\u00een cadrul unei puteri de decizie sau de dispozi\\u021bie existente. Devine penal dac\\u0103 aceast\\u0103 autoritate este abuzat\\u0103 cu bun\\u0103 \\u0219tiin\\u021b\\u0103 \\u0219i \\u00een mod nejustificat \\u00een detrimentul persoanei \\u00eendrept\\u0103\\u021bite din punct de vedere economic. Prin urmare, accentul nu se pune pe inducerea \\u00een eroare, ci pe \\u00eenc\\u0103lcarea obliga\\u021biilor \\u0219i a \\u00eencrederii.   \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Trebuie ca f\\u0103ptuitorul s\\u0103 doreasc\\u0103 s\\u0103 se \\u00eembog\\u0103\\u021beasc\\u0103 \\u00een cazul abuzului de \\u00eencredere?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Nu, o inten\\u021bie de \\u00eembog\\u0103\\u021bire nu este necesar\\u0103 pentru abuzul de \\u00eencredere. Este suficient ca f\\u0103ptuitorul s\\u0103 provoace cu bun\\u0103 \\u0219tiin\\u021b\\u0103 abuzul de autoritate \\u0219i prejudiciul patrimonial rezultat. Chiar dac\\u0103 f\\u0103ptuitorul nu urm\\u0103re\\u0219te un avantaj propriu, fapta poate fi \\u00eendeplinit\\u0103. Decisiv r\\u0103m\\u00e2ne dac\\u0103 dezavantajul patrimonial este recunoscut ca o consecin\\u021b\\u0103 necesar\\u0103 a ac\\u021biunilor.   \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Ce probe sunt de obicei importante \\u00een procedurile de abuz de \\u00eencredere?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Importante sunt documentele care fac ca amploarea autorit\\u0103\\u021bii \\u0219i procesele de decizie s\\u0103 fie inteligibile, deoarece exact acolo \\u00eencepe acuza\\u021bia. Acestea includ contracte, procuri, documente ale societ\\u0103\\u021bii, directive interne, precum \\u0219i comunic\\u0103ri precum e-mailuri sau protocoale. \\u00cen plus, documentele contabile, fluxurile de pl\\u0103\\u021bi \\u0219i expertizele privind valoarea daunei joac\\u0103 un rol central. Deoarece este vorba despre caracterul nejustificat \\u0219i inten\\u021bia, sunt relevante \\u00een special \\u0219i indiciile privind procesul de decizie.   \"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Poate persoana prejudiciat\\u0103 s\\u0103 solicite desp\\u0103gubiri \\u00een procedura penal\\u0103?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Da, persoana prejudiciat\\u0103 din punct de vedere economic poate face valabile preten\\u021bii ca parte v\\u0103t\\u0103mat\\u0103 \\u00een procedura penal\\u0103, dac\\u0103 prejudiciul este o consecin\\u021b\\u0103 a abuzului de autoritate. \\u00cen practic\\u0103, preten\\u021biile trebuie s\\u0103 fie clar cuantificate \\u0219i dovedite prin documente, deoarece altfel doar o parte este acordat\\u0103. \\u00cen plus, procedura penal\\u0103 nu \\u00eenlocuie\\u0219te o documenta\\u021bie curat\\u0103 a prejudiciului, ci se bazeaz\\u0103 pe aceasta. Dac\\u0103 cuantificarea nu reu\\u0219e\\u0219te, litigiul se mut\\u0103 adesea \\u00eentr-o procedur\\u0103 civil\\u0103, prin urmare, asisten\\u021ba juridic\\u0103 timpurie este util\\u0103.   \"}}]}<\/script><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-Untreue-Q1 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">C\u00e2nd exist\u0103 abuz de \u00eencredere conform \u00a7 153 StGB?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Exist\u0103 abuz de \u00eencredere atunci c\u00e2nd cineva abuzeaz\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 de o autoritate acordat\u0103 asupra averii str\u0103ine sau pentru obliga\u021bia juridic\u0103 a altuia \u0219i cauzeaz\u0103 astfel un prejudiciu patrimonial. Decisiv este faptul c\u0103 exist\u0103 o obliga\u021bie special\u0103 de \u00eengrijire a averii \u0219i c\u0103 autoritatea este exercitat\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod nejustificat. Nu orice \u00eenc\u0103lcare a obliga\u021biilor este suficient\u0103, ci doar un abuz de autoritate grav. \u00cen plus, prejudiciul trebuie s\u0103 fie o consecin\u021b\u0103 direct\u0103 a acestui abuz.   <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-Untreue-Q2 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Care este diferen\u021ba dintre abuzul de \u00eencredere \u0219i fraud\u0103?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>\u00cen cazul fraudei, prejudiciul este cauzat de \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune \u0219i de o eroare a victimei, deoarece victima efectueaz\u0103 o dispozi\u021bie patrimonial\u0103 din cauza erorii. \u00cen cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere, aceast\u0103 \u00een\u0219el\u0103ciune lipse\u0219te, deoarece f\u0103ptuitorul ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 \u00een cadrul unei puteri de decizie sau de dispozi\u021bie existente. Devine penal dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 autoritate este abuzat\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u0219i \u00een mod nejustificat \u00een detrimentul persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u021bite din punct de vedere economic. Prin urmare, accentul nu se pune pe inducerea \u00een eroare, ci pe \u00eenc\u0103lcarea obliga\u021biilor \u0219i a \u00eencrederii.   <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-Untreue-Q3 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Trebuie ca f\u0103ptuitorul s\u0103 doreasc\u0103 s\u0103 se \u00eembog\u0103\u021beasc\u0103 \u00een cazul abuzului de \u00eencredere?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Nu, o inten\u021bie de \u00eembog\u0103\u021bire nu este necesar\u0103 pentru abuzul de \u00eencredere. Este suficient ca f\u0103ptuitorul s\u0103 provoace cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 abuzul de autoritate \u0219i prejudiciul patrimonial rezultat. Chiar dac\u0103 f\u0103ptuitorul nu urm\u0103re\u0219te un avantaj propriu, fapta poate fi \u00eendeplinit\u0103. Decisiv r\u0103m\u00e2ne dac\u0103 dezavantajul patrimonial este recunoscut ca o consecin\u021b\u0103 necesar\u0103 a ac\u021biunilor.   <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-Untreue-Q4 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Ce probe sunt de obicei importante \u00een procedurile de abuz de \u00eencredere?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Importante sunt documentele care fac ca amploarea autorit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i procesele de decizie s\u0103 fie inteligibile, deoarece exact acolo \u00eencepe acuza\u021bia. Acestea includ contracte, procuri, documente ale societ\u0103\u021bii, directive interne, precum \u0219i comunic\u0103ri precum e-mailuri sau protocoale. \u00cen plus, documentele contabile, fluxurile de pl\u0103\u021bi \u0219i expertizele privind valoarea daunei joac\u0103 un rol central. Deoarece este vorba despre caracterul nejustificat \u0219i inten\u021bia, sunt relevante \u00een special \u0219i indiciile privind procesul de decizie.   <\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-Untreue-Q5 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Poate persoana prejudiciat\u0103 s\u0103 solicite desp\u0103gubiri \u00een procedura penal\u0103?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Da, persoana prejudiciat\u0103 din punct de vedere economic poate face valabile preten\u021bii ca parte v\u0103t\u0103mat\u0103 \u00een procedura penal\u0103, dac\u0103 prejudiciul este o consecin\u021b\u0103 a abuzului de autoritate. \u00cen practic\u0103, preten\u021biile trebuie s\u0103 fie clar cuantificate \u0219i dovedite prin documente, deoarece altfel doar o parte este acordat\u0103. \u00cen plus, procedura penal\u0103 nu \u00eenlocuie\u0219te o documenta\u021bie curat\u0103 a prejudiciului, ci se bazeaz\u0103 pe aceasta. Dac\u0103 cuantificarea nu reu\u0219e\u0219te, litigiul se mut\u0103 adesea \u00eentr-o procedur\u0103 civil\u0103, prin urmare, asisten\u021ba juridic\u0103 timpurie este util\u0103.   <\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><a class=\"mr-cta-link mr-cta-button-cal\" href=\"#h2-booking\" title=\"Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103\"><span class=\"mr-cta-link-normal\">Alege\u021bi acum data dorit\u0103:<\/span><span class=\"mr-cta-link-bold\">Consulta\u021bie ini\u021bial\u0103 gratuit\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Abuz de \u00eencredere Exist\u0103 un abuz de \u00eencredere conform \u00a7 153 StGB dac\u0103 o persoan\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i abuzeaz\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 de o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103 de a dispune de averea altuia &#8230;","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":101350,"parent":45855,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1012],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110918","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-drept-penal"],"acf":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue.webp",1920,1080,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-100x100.webp",100,100,true],"medium":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-800x450.webp",800,450,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue.webp",1920,1080,false],"large":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue.webp",1920,1080,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue.webp",1536,864,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue.webp",1920,1080,false],"336x":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-336x189.webp",336,189,true],"352x":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-352x198.webp",352,198,true],"woocommerce_thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-300x300.webp",300,300,true],"woocommerce_single":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-600x338.webp",600,338,true],"woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-100x100.webp",100,100,true],"yarpp-thumbnail":["https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/\u00a7153-Untreue-120x120.webp",120,120,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Simon Prem","author_link":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/author\/simon-prem\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Abuz de \u00eencredere Exist\u0103 un abuz de \u00eencredere conform \u00a7 153 StGB dac\u0103 o persoan\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i abuzeaz\u0103 cu bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 de o competen\u021b\u0103 acordat\u0103 de a dispune de averea altuia ...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/110918","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110918"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/110918\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/45855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}