{"id":88569,"date":"2019-04-15T09:11:09","date_gmt":"2019-04-15T07:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/teise-atsisakyti-ciuziniu-po-apsaugines-pleveles-pasalinimo\/"},"modified":"2025-11-26T10:11:09","modified_gmt":"2025-11-26T09:11:09","slug":"teise-atsisakyti-ciuziniu-po-apsaugines-pleveles-pasalinimo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/teise-atsisakyti-ciuziniu-po-apsaugines-pleveles-pasalinimo\/","title":{"rendered":"Teis\u0117 atsisakyti \u010diu\u017eini\u0173 po apsaugin\u0117s pl\u0117vel\u0117s pa\u0161alinimo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ESTT 2019 m. kovo 27 d. sprendimu (<a href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=212283&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=DE&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=1862854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"C-681\/17 (&#xF6;ffnet in neuem Tab)\">C-681\/17<\/a>) nusprend\u0117: vartotojai turi teis\u0119 gr\u0105\u017einti internetu u\u017esakyt\u0105 \u010diu\u017ein\u012f pardav\u0117jui pagal atsisakymo teis\u0119, net jei apsaugin\u0117 pl\u0117vel\u0117 buvo pa\u0161alinta i\u0161bandymo tikslais.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pl\u0117vel\u0117 pa\u0161alinta i\u0161bandymui<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Vartotojas Sascha L. i\u0161 Vokietijos internetu u\u017esisak\u0117 \u010diu\u017ein\u012f. Po pristatymo jis pa\u0161alino apsaugin\u0119 pl\u0117vel\u0119, kad i\u0161bandyt\u0173. Tiek to.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Po i\u0161bandymo Sascha L. nusprend\u0117 pasinaudoti savo teise atsisakyti pirkimo. Taigi \u010diu\u017einys buvo gr\u0105\u017eintas pardav\u0117jui, o L. tik\u0117josi atgauti 1 094,52 EUR pirkimo kain\u0105. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Negr\u0105\u017einama be plombos<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ta\u010diau bald\u0173 pardav\u0117jas pirkimo kainos negr\u0105\u017eino. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Atsisakymo teis\u0117s i\u0161imtis teigia, kad atsisakymo teis\u0117 netaikoma u\u017eplombuotoms prek\u0117ms, kurios d\u0117l sveikatos apsaugos ar higienos prie\u017eas\u010di\u0173 n\u0117ra tinkamos gr\u0105\u017einti, jei j\u0173 plomba buvo pa\u0161alinta po pristatymo. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bald\u0173 pardav\u0117jas laik\u0117si nuomon\u0117s, kad \u010diu\u017einiai priklauso \u0161iai preki\u0173 kategorijai.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ESTT sprendimas <\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Byla pasiek\u0117 Vokietijos Federalin\u012f Auk\u0161\u010diausi\u0105j\u012f Teism\u0105, kuris kreip\u0117si \u012f ESTT d\u0117l prejudicinio sprendimo.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ESTT nusprend\u0117, kad \u010diu\u017einius i\u0161 esm\u0117s galima i\u0161bandyti ir patikrinti j\u0173 savybes po pirkimo internetu. ESTT nuomone, \u010diu\u017einiai nepriklauso tiems produktams, kuri\u0173 d\u0117l higienos ar sveikatos prie\u017eas\u010di\u0173 nebegali naudoti tre\u010diosios \u0161alys, kai plomba buvo atidaryta.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Viena vertus, ESTT nurod\u0117 aplinkyb\u0119, kad vie\u0161bu\u010diuose \u010diu\u017einius naudoja daug \u017emoni\u0173 i\u0161 eil\u0117s. M\u016bs\u0173 nuomone, tai \u0161lubuojantis argumentas. Vargu ar kas nors pirkt\u0173 naudot\u0105 vie\u0161bu\u010dio \u010diu\u017ein\u012f.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kita vertus, ESTT palygino \u010diu\u017eini\u0173 bandym\u0105 su drabu\u017ei\u0173 matavimusi. Net ir matuojantis drabu\u017eius jie lie\u010diasi su \u017emogaus oda. Nepaisant to, n\u0117ra praktikos taikyti jiems specialius apsaugos reikalavimus, siekiant i\u0161vengti s\u0105ly\u010dio su \u017emogaus oda. \u0160is argumentas, m\u016bs\u0173 nuomone, yra suprantamas ir tinkamesnis. Trumpas naujo \u010diu\u017einio be apsaugin\u0117s pl\u0117vel\u0117s i\u0161bandymas labiau pana\u0161us \u012f naujo drabu\u017eio matavim\u0105si nei \u012f nuolat naudojam\u0105 vie\u0161bu\u010dio \u010diu\u017ein\u012f.    <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blogiausiu atveju pardav\u0117jas gali i\u0161valyti ir dezinfekuoti tiek drabu\u017eius, tiek \u010diu\u017einius prie\u0161 perpardavim\u0105. Apibendrinant, \u010diu\u017einiai n\u0117ra prek\u0117s, kurios pristatomas u\u017eplombuotos ir d\u0117l sveikatos apsaugos ar higienos prie\u017eas\u010di\u0173 n\u0117ra tinkamos gr\u0105\u017einti, jei j\u0173 plomba buvo pa\u0161alinta po pristatymo.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">D\u0117mesio<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Net jei vartotojas pernelyg intensyviai naudoja prek\u0119 j\u0105 tikrindamas, vartotojas nepraranda teis\u0117s atsisakyti pirkimo. Ta\u010diau jis atsako u\u017e bet kok\u012f prek\u0117s vert\u0117s suma\u017e\u0117jim\u0105, atsiradus\u012f d\u0117l elgesio su preke, kuris n\u0117ra b\u016btinas jos savyb\u0117ms, ypatyb\u0117ms ir veikimui patikrinti. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">I\u0161vada<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ESTT \u0161iuo sprendimu nubr\u0117\u017e\u0117 raudon\u0105 linij\u0105. Ne kiekviena prek\u0117, kuri tikrinimo metu lie\u010diasi su \u017emogaus oda, automati\u0161kai tampa netinkama naudoti. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tai gana protingas sprendimas. Juk svetain\u0117s sofos nei\u0161metate po to, kai ant jos s\u0117d\u0117jo sve\u010diai. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"ESTT 2019 m. kovo 27 d. sprendimu (C-681\/17) nusprend\u0117: vartotojai turi teis\u0119 gr\u0105\u017einti internetu u\u017esakyt\u0105 \u010diu\u017ein\u012f pardav\u0117jui pagal atsisakymo teis\u0119, net jei apsaugin\u0117 pl\u0117vel\u0117 buvo pa\u0161alinta i\u0161bandymo tikslais. Pl\u0117vel\u0117 pa\u0161alinta &#8230;","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1292],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-e-prekybos-teise"],"acf":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"336x":false,"352x":false,"woocommerce_thumbnail":false,"woocommerce_single":false,"woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail":false,"yarpp-thumbnail":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Peter Harlander","author_link":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/author\/secondpromotion\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"ESTT 2019 m. kovo 27 d. sprendimu (C-681\/17) nusprend\u0117: vartotojai turi teis\u0119 gr\u0105\u017einti internetu u\u017esakyt\u0105 \u010diu\u017ein\u012f pardav\u0117jui pagal atsisakymo teis\u0119, net jei apsaugin\u0117 pl\u0117vel\u0117 buvo pa\u0161alinta i\u0161bandymo tikslais. Pl\u0117vel\u0117 pa\u0161alinta ...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88569\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/harlander-partner.eu\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}